Cookie policy: This site uses cookies (small files stored on your computer) to simplify and improve your experience of this website. Cookies are small text files stored on the device you are using to access this website. For more information please take a look at our terms and conditions. Some parts of the site may not work properly if you choose not to accept cookies.

Join

Subscribe or Register

Existing user? Login

A provocative point that came out as a damaging statement

Like Brian Furman (The Pharmaceutical Journal 2014;293:276), I was distraught that a senior person in our profession could make such an outdated and factually incorrect statement at the Royal Pharmaceutical Society conference (2014:293:234).

Bill Scott, Scotland’s chief pharmaceutical officer, well knows that for any pharmacist to advise a patient on the use of a medicine, they should understand the patient’s condition and the medicine to be taken for it. I believe this is science and is central to our profession. To even think that a knowledge of pharmacokinetics, drug metabolism, safety profiles and even impurities and the recognition and consequences of counterfeit medicines do not require substantial scientific knowledge, including chemistry, is depressing to say the least.

It is also a fact that, since its inception, the General Pharmaceutical Council (GPhC) has sought to encourage schools of pharmacy to show students the place of science throughout the whole of their course, not as isolated strands but as key elements of understanding the content of the profession they aspire to. I am an assessor at the GPhC and see the benefits of the new approach on every accreditation visit.

Scott should look more closely at the huge changes already actioned in schools of pharmacy before he uses his positional authority to play down both the content and the delivery of modern pharmacy education. He and I have sat on panels at the British Pharmaceutical Conference in the past and I know he is well aware of the underpinning place for the sciences, so I imagine that he was making a provocative point (which he is known to do) for a particular purpose. It is a real pity that it has come out as a particularly damaging statement.

Bill Dawson

Chairman

Academy of Pharmaceutical Sciences 

Citation: The Pharmaceutical Journal URI: 20066633

Readers' comments (1)

  • Science is important for pharmacists but it must be the right kind ie. medical science, taking in prescribing and diagnostics so that pharmacists can really take over treatment of patients and help relieve drastic GP shortage.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

For commenting, please login or register as a user and agree to our Community Guidelines. You will be re-directed back to this page where you will have the ability to comment.

Recommended from Pharmaceutical Press

  • FASTtrack: Physical Pharmacy

    FASTtrack: Physical Pharmacy

    A revision book for students giving bullet points of basic information on physical pharmacy. Includes memory maps, questions and answers to aid revision.

    £24.00Buy now
  • Injectable Drugs Guide

    Injectable Drugs Guide

    A user friendly, single point of reference for healthcare professionals in the safe and effective administration of injectable medicines.

    £52.00Buy now

Search an extensive range of the world’s most trusted resources

Powered by MedicinesComplete
  • Print
  • Share
  • Comment
  • Save
  • Print Friendly Version of this pagePrint Get a PDF version of this webpagePDF

Newsletter Sign-up

Want to keep up with the latest news, comment and CPD articles in pharmacy and science? Subscribe to our free alerts.