Cookie policy: This site uses cookies (small files stored on your computer) to simplify and improve your experience of this website. Cookies are small text files stored on the device you are using to access this website. For more information please take a look at our terms and conditions. Some parts of the site may not work properly if you choose not to accept cookies.

Join

Subscribe or Register

Existing user? Login

My concerns with changes to the conscience clause

I read with interest about the proposed change to the conscience clause for pharmacists (The Pharmaceutical Journal online, 22 December 2016). This concerns me.

I have been a Christian for 59 years and a pharmacist for 36 years. One of the reasons I chose pharmacy was that, unlike medicine, there was no pressure to compromise my own values and beliefs.

When various new services were introduced, such as the availability of contraception on the NHS, the legalisation of abortion in Britain, etc, there were built-in safeguards for those of us who joined the profession to opt out of providing certain services that goes against our beliefs.

Now the powers that be seem intent on taking away our freedom of conscience. There is already a great deal of pressure on me and like-minded people to cave in to providing emergency hormonal contraception and other services that I deem unethical. And in the future, if the conscience clause no longer exists, would I be pressured to provide services such as assisted dying?

Andrew Paxton

Lancaster

Citation: The Pharmaceutical Journal DOI: 10.1211/PJ.2017.20202195

Readers' comments (1)

  • If I understand the wording of the proposed new "conscience clause" correctly, it still does not compel, for example, provision of emergency hormonal contraception by those who find it unacceptable to do so because of their religious beliefs. But it does expect such individuals to acknowledge that there will be times when the majority of practitioners and indeed the regulators believe that the patient/client's interests will be best served by the provision of the service in question. The pharmacist who is unwilling by reason of conscience to provide the service, or indeed a member of support staff, simply has to "signpost" the patient in good faith to someone who is able to provide the service in a timely manner. A pharmacy is not the right place to be judgmental about such matters. Similarly, it is to be presumed that prescriptions for emergency hormonal contraception or indeed the contraceptive "pill" will not be turned away by those pharmacists who believe that contraception is wrong?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

For commenting, please login or register as a user and agree to our Community Guidelines. You will be re-directed back to this page where you will have the ability to comment.

Recommended from Pharmaceutical Press

  • Dale and Appelbe's Pharmacy and Medicines Law

    Dale and Appelbe's Pharmacy and Medicines Law

    This new edition of Dale and Appelbe's Pharmacy and Medicines Law is the definitive guide to law and ethics for pharmacy practice in the UK. It covers law and professional regulation and is firmly established as the definitive student textbook and reference work on this subject in the UK. Fully updated to include changes to pharmacy laws and regulation.

    £55.00Buy now

Search an extensive range of the world’s most trusted resources

Powered by MedicinesComplete
  • Print
  • Share
  • Comment
  • Save
  • Print Friendly Version of this pagePrint Get a PDF version of this webpagePDF

Jobs you might like

Newsletter Sign-up

Want to keep up with the latest news, comment and CPD articles in pharmacy and science? Subscribe to our free alerts.