Cookie policy: This site uses cookies (small files stored on your computer) to simplify and improve your experience of this website. Cookies are small text files stored on the device you are using to access this website. For more information please take a look at our terms and conditions. Some parts of the site may not work properly if you choose not to accept cookies.

Join

Subscribe or Register

Existing user? Login

Science is an essential component of undergraduate pharmacy education

It was with incredulity that I read the reported comments of Scotland’s Chief Pharmaceutical Officer on the removal of science from the undergraduate pharmacy curriculum (The Pharmaceutical Journal 2014:293:234). Given the enormous challenges of future healthcare provision, with escalating costs of medicines, an aging population, growing antimicrobial resistance and inadequate treatment owing to non-compliance, pharmacists have a huge contribution to make to healthcare in the 21st century.

However, this contribution must be evidence based. Without a thorough understanding of the underlying science, pharmacists would become third-rate doctors, dispensing medicines along with parroted advice, with no depth, resulting, before long, in a complete lack of credibility and the demise of the profession. These comments suggest that Scott has no contact with modern pharmacy courses, which have been developing rapidly since the General Pharmaceutical Council published its standards for the initial education and training of pharmacists in 2011. These standards demand an integrated approach, where science and practice are now blended in a seamless way, in order for students to fully appreciate the importance of science to their practice and to their provision of pharmaceutical care.

Courses are evolving continuously and the first graduates of the fully integrated courses are yet to appear. Of course, we need evidence that these graduates will be better equipped than current ones. However, what is indisputable is that, without the underpinning science, they most certainly would be incapable of fulfilling such roles.

Brian Furman

Emeritus Professor of Pharmacology

University of Strathclyde

Glasgow

Citation: The Pharmaceutical Journal URI: 20066479

Readers' comments (2)

  • 100% agreed!
    Mr Scott's comments appear to have no link with ground realities. To lose our science would be a discredit to the profession and would surely signal a downward spiral into a path of irrelevance and poor credibility. In this age of advancing modern medicine where new evidence is constantly emerging and new drugs are being promoted at the rate of knots we need MORE not less science.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I also agree 100% with the views expressed in Brian Furman's letter. The services and advice offered by pharmacists must be underpinned by the relevant science. The urgent need now is the implementation of the proposals put forward by the Modernising Pharmacy Careers Programme Board.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

For commenting, please login or register as a user and agree to our Community Guidelines. You will be re-directed back to this page where you will have the ability to comment.

Recommended from Pharmaceutical Press

Search an extensive range of the world’s most trusted resources

Powered by MedicinesComplete
  • Print
  • Share
  • Comment
  • Save
  • Print Friendly Version of this pagePrint Get a PDF version of this webpagePDF

Jobs you might like

See more jobs

Newsletter Sign-up

Want to keep up with the latest news, comment and CPD articles in pharmacy and science? Subscribe to our free alerts.