Cookie policy: This site uses cookies (small files stored on your computer) to simplify and improve your experience of this website. Cookies are small text files stored on the device you are using to access this website. For more information please take a look at our terms and conditions. Some parts of the site may not work properly if you choose not to accept cookies.


Subscribe or Register

Existing user? Login

Issue : The Pharmaceutical Journal, September 2005

Sort by: Newest first Oldest first A-Z Z-A

  • A common vision Subscription

    30 SEP 2005 23:00

    This week, members of the pharmacy profession gathered in Manchester for the annual British Pharmaceutical Conference. The theme of the conference, "A common vision for health", was illustrated by many speakers who looked to the future in their fields, be they in the pharmaceutical sciences, pharmacy practice, regulation and professional development, and the broader NHS.

  • A debate which bears repetition? Subscription

    30 SEP 2005 23:00

    Richard Schmidt (PJ, 17 September, p336) questions why homoeopathic doses of quinine are not used to treat malaria. The short answer is, they are. In Homoeopathic Medical Repertory1, both china officinalis (Hahnemann's original peruvian bark) and the closely allied china sulph (sulphite of quinine) are two of the top 14 or so remedies listed.

  • Is the Lancet trial really valid? Subscription

    30 SEP 2005 23:00

    I wish to raise a number of concerns about the recent meta-analysis of homoeopathy by Shang et al reported in the Lancet1, which has generated much discussion in the PJ. The trial is based on 110 trials of homoeopathy and 110 trials of conventional medicine, which are said to be matched to the homoeopathy trials, although the criteria for matching are not clearly stated.

  • Logic lacking in editorial Subscription

    30 SEP 2005 23:00

    The editorial entitled "Homoeopathy hubbub" (PJ, 3 September, p272) is open minded but seems to have forgotten that journalists, like scientists, should also have critical minds. I am neither for nor against homoeopathy per se, but the logic of the editorial seems somewhat lacking.

  • More than we realise? Subscription

    30 SEP 2005 23:00

    Recent correspondents to the PJ have discussed the need for more pharmacists in documentary programmes. It was good to see an articulate young pharmacist in a recent edition of City Hospital giving advice on pain-killers. I am not sure if he has a regular slot or if this was a one-off. Perhaps there are more pharmacists appearing in local media than we realise?

  • Chondroitin and warfarin: an interaction of note? Subscription

    30 SEP 2005 23:00

    Recently, a customer in the pharmacy asked me if it was OK to take chondroitin while also taking warfarin. I consulted the usual resources: the British National Formulary and the National Pharmacy Association. No interaction was listed in the BNF and the NPA could not find anything.

  • Concern over tablet presentation Subscription

    30 SEP 2005 23:00

    I acknowledge the issues raised by Elaine Mitchell (PJ, 24 September, p369) regarding the varying appearance of tablets, but suggest she should leave the issue for the Department of Health to address, rather than castigate her colleagues for using generic or imported medicines.

  • Other possible approaches for solving the issue of quantity differences Subscription

    30 SEP 2005 23:00

    I read with interest the news item on original packs in the PJ (17 September, p329) and the consultation by the Department of Health ( As a practising community pharmacist, I was particularly interested in the issue regarding the quantity (of tablets or capsules, etc) to dispense when the quantity prescribed is 28 and the original pack contains 30 (and vice versa).

  • A few problems foreseen Subscription

    30 SEP 2005 23:00

    I applaud the Royal Pharmaceutical Society for its support of the idea of original pack dispensing. However, I can foresee a few problems:

  • GP surgery will not co-operate Subscription

    30 SEP 2005 23:00

    There has been a lot of discussion about the new contract - I have tried hard to communicate with my local GP surgery by writing letters, telephoning, etc. I am always told that they have no time to speak to me, not even for five minutes.

Show  10 per page20 per page50 per page

Newsletter Sign-up

Want to keep up with the latest news, comment and CPD articles in pharmacy and science? Subscribe to our free alerts.