Cookie policy: This site uses cookies (small files stored on your computer) to simplify and improve your experience of this website. Cookies are small text files stored on the device you are using to access this website. For more information please take a look at our terms and conditions. Some parts of the site may not work properly if you choose not to accept cookies.


Subscribe or Register

Existing user? Login


Drug-induced eosinophilia

This review looks at drugs that produce eosinophilia and explains how this condition may be managed

Eosinophils are a type of white blood cell formed in the bone marrow from stem cells. They are granulocytes derived from the same progenitor cells as monocytes, macrophages, neutrophils and basophils. The usual blood eosinophil count is 350 per mm3 with diurnal variation; the peak occurs at night and the trough in the morning. The circulating half-life of most eosinophils is six to 12 hours with most eosinophils residing in tissues (eg, the upper respiratory and gastrointestinal tract).1

There are a number of hypotheses regarding the function of eosinophils. It has been suggested they modulate the intensity of immunoglobulin E (IgE) and IgG-mediated reactions, for example, in schistosomiasis.2 They are toxic to helminths in vitro and it is also possible that eosinophils protect against certain tissue invasive metazoan parasites such as Pneumocystis carinii.1,3 Finally, they may act via hormones such as adrenaline, oestrogens or glucocorticoids.3

Eosinophilia is defined as a peripheral blood eosinophil count greater than 350 per mm3.1 (Hypereosinophilia is defined as a peripheral blood count greater than 1,500 per mm3.) It is a common allergic manifestation of many drugs and usually disappears when the drug is stopped. Unless very severe, the severity of eosinophilia is solely related to the allergic responses that accompany it. The parts of the body that tend to be affected are the heart, lungs, skin, joints, gut and central nervous system. Prolonged periods of eosinophilia may result in tissue damage although the exact mechanism by which this occurs is still unclear.1

GSK teaser

There are a number of causes of eosinophilia, allergic and atopic diseases being among the most common.1 Infections, particularly parasitic infestation, may produce an eosinophilia, as may fungal infections. Generally, however, bacterial or viral infections are associated with eosinopenia.4 Neoplastic disease, for example Hodgkin’s disease, may occasionally cause an elevated eosinophil count.3 Connective tissue disorders and skin disorders, such as pemphigus, are often associated with eosinophilia.1

The eosinophilic pneumonias are a group of diseases of both known and unknown aetiology, characterised by eosinophilic pulmonary infiltration and peripheral blood eosinophilia. Simple pulmonary eosinophilia is known as L?ffler’s syndrome and may be associated with a low grade fever, minimal respiratory symptoms and prompt recovery.1

Relating eosinophilia to a particular drug can be difficult. Hypersensitivity reactions to substances such as nickel, ragweed, pollen, poison ivy extracts, helminthic infestations, brucellosis, amoebiasis and coccidioidomycosis have all been associated with eosinophilia.5 To confirm a drug reaction, these chemical and infectious causes must be excluded. Diagnosis is further complicated because the drug may worsen a pre-existing eosinophilia, particularly in an atopic patient.6 Given that allergic reactions may result in eosinophilia, it would appear to be a potential problem with many drugs, as dictated by the idiosyncratic response of the individual patient.

This paper concentrates on drugs that are reported to produce serious reactions, rather than mild or self-limiting drug induced eosinophilia. Drugs associated with eosinophilia are outlined in Table 1 (p73).

Table 1: Drugs associated with drug-induced eosinophilia


Type of reaction

Severity of eosinophilia

Antimalarials, eg, pyrimethamine and dapsone


May be severe


Various; renal and dermal reactions reported

Usually mild and self-limiting


Dermal and renal reactions reported



Various; cardiac, pulmonary and dermal reactions reported

Usually mild and self-limiting


Pulmonary and cardiac reactions reported

Not usually reported to be severe

Tetracyclines, especially minocycline

Pulmonary reactions

Not usually reported to be severe


Pulmonary reaction

Can produce chronic symptoms

Anti-tuberculous therapies

Various; dermal, pulmonary and gut reactions reported


ACE inhibitors

Dermal and pulmonary reactions reported

Not usually reported to be severe


Multisystem; musculosketetal and dermal problems common

Possibly severe; fatalities have been reported

Anticonvulsants, eg, phenytoin, carbamazepine and phenobarbitone

Multisystem; dermal, liver, cardiac and pulmonary complications reported

Possibly severe, life threatening reaction


Usually pulmonary complications

Not usually severe, although severe reactions have been reported


Usually dermal complications

Usually mild and self-limiting

H2 -receptor antagonists

Pulmonary complications reported


Proton pump inhibitors

Renal and musculosketetal complications reported

Not usually reported to be severe


Pulmonary complications reported



Usually pulmonary reaction reported

Not usually severe, although severe reactions have been reported

Anti-infective agents

Antimalarials There are case reports of pulmonary eosinophilia in three patients taking pyrimethamine-dapsone (Maloprim; Wellcome) and in one patient taking pyrimethamine-chloroquine (Daraclor; Wellcome).7 In two of these cases a lung biopsy confirmed pulmonary eosinophilia. Rechallenge with Maloprim by the patient in one case had near fatal results. Pyrimethamine was the common drug in all four cases, so the authors concluded that pyrimethamine may cause eosinophilia.

There is a case report of pulmonary eosinophilia (Löffler’s syndrome) associated with dapsone usage.8The patient recovered, but the authors recommended the eosinophil count should be carefully monitored in patients receiving dapsone.

Penicillins Penicillins are commonly quoted as causing eosinophilia.4,9,10 However, few case reports could be found, suggesting the eosinophilia is usually mild and transient. Penicillin-induced eosinophilia has been reported associated with nephropathy and interstitial nephritis.11 Eosinophiluria may also be present.

Penicillin therapy has been reported to cause eosinophilia with a fever and a maculopapular rash.12 There has been a report of the potentially fatal condition of toxic epidermal necrolysis.13 Fever and eosinophilia were also noted.

Penicillins have also been implicated in causing the potentially fatal condition of hypersensitivity myocarditis, with presenting symptoms of fever and rash.14

Cephalosporins The incidence of eosinophilic reactions in patients taking cephalosporins is quoted as approximately 8 per cent.15 There are, however, few reports in the literature, suggesting, therefore, that cephalosporin-induced eosinophilia, like penicillin-induced eosinophilia, is usually mild and transient.

There are two cases of a peripheral blood eosinophilia and hematuria in two patients treated with high-dose cephalexin (20?24g daily).16 In one case the symptoms included a fever, maculopapular pruritic discharge and a generalised lymphadenopathy. In both cases symptoms resolved once cephalexin was discontinued, but, unfortunately, rechallenge could not be carried out.

Cephalexin has also been reported to cause pulmonary eosinophilia.17 A patient developed a diffuse maculopapular rash seven days after commencing cephalexin therapy (500mg three times a day). Eosinophilia and diffuse consolidation of both lungs were noted. The patient made a complete recovery after prednisolone therapy and discontinuation of cephalexin.

There is a reported case of cephalosporin therapy associated with peripheral eosinophilia, pericarditis and eosinophilic cholecystitis.15 This resolved rapidly when cephalosporin therapy was discontinued. The authors concluded that although a rechallenge would be necessary to confirm hypersensitivity, the close temporal association suggests that the cephalosporin caused the eosinophilic cholecystitis and pericarditis.

Ciprofloxacin There is a case report of eosinophilic meningitis associated with ciprofloxacin administration.18 Five days after a course of ciprofloxacin (500mg twice a day) had been commenced, the patient presented with fever and neck pain. The patient’s peripheral white blood cell count was 6,700/mm3 with 6 per cent eosinophilia. The lumbar puncture revealed 147 white blood cells with 24 per cent eosinophils; the rest were mononuclear cells. Cytologic examination of the spinal fluid confirmed the presence of large numbers of eosinophils, but showed no malignancy. Following supportive treatment the patient made a full recovery. The authors stated that eosinophilic meningitis is very uncommon and is only rarely caused by drugs, but they concluded in this case the most likely diagnosis was eosinophilic meningitis caused by ciprofloxacin therapy.

Glycopeptide antibiotics Vancomycin has been reported to cause a delayed hypersensitivity reaction with eosinophilia, and symptoms such as a delayed cutaneous eruption; interstitial nephritis and fever are often present.19,20 Although, usually, the patients are on multiple medication making the association less clear, there is one case in a patient on just vancomycin and warfarin.19 The patient had been receiving 1.75g of vancomycin intravenously as a single daily dose for four weeks, when fever, erythema multiforme, eosinophilia, and presumed interstitial nephritis were noted.
The reaction resolved upon discontinuation of vancomycin and initiation of methylprednisolone therapy. As warfarin very rarely causes a hypersensitivity reaction, the authors suggested the most likely cause was the vancomycin.

Teicoplanin has been reported to cause a similar reaction of interstitial nephritis and eosinophilia, although fever and rash were not noted.21 Again the reaction was delayed: an elevated serum creatinine was first noted after 40 days of teicoplanin therapy. There was no resolution of the nephritis despite discontinuation of teicoplanin.

Sulphonamides Sulphonamides are among the best known drugs capable of causing pulmonary eosinophilia, which, in the 1940s, was commonly associated with sulphonamide antibiotics. It tended to occur 10?14 days after exposure and the symptoms included fever, blood eosinophilia and new pulmonary opacities. These rapidly disappeared after the sulphonamide was discontinued.22 Sulphonamides have also been associated with the development of hypersensitivity myocarditis.14

Tetracyclines While pulmonary eosinophilia has been reported following the administration of tetracycline,23 it is more frequently associated with minocycline.

Minocycline-induced syndrome of pulmonary eosinophilia is characterised by pulmonary infiltrates on the chest roentgenogram, chest symptoms such as dyspnoea, and eosinophilia in blood and bronchoalveolar lavage fluids.24 These presenting symptoms may be severe enough to lead to transient respiratory failure and require treatment with steroids. The outcome after minocycline has been discontinued is generally good and there have been no reports of fatalities.25

Nitrofurantoin There are a number of reports of nitrofurantoin causing pulmonary disease with eosinophilia.9,26 Nitrofurantoin is unique among drugs causing pulmonary eosinophilia, in that there is an acute and a chronic pattern.9 The acute episode, which tends to occur within one month of therapy, presents as a fever with cough and pulmonary infiltrates, and there is often a marked peripheral blood eosinophilia.9 These complications usually resolve within 15 days if nitrofurantoin is discontinued,26 but continued therapy may lead to a chronic disease which is characterised by fibrosis.10 Other symptoms of the chronic disease, which is less common and tends to occur two months to five years after initiation of therapy, include an exertional dyspnoea and a non-productive cough.9 Nitrofurantoin should be stopped if this is suspected.9

Amphotericin B There is a case report describing eosinophilia and a generalised maculopapular rash as apparent manifestations of amphotericin B hypersensitivity.27 The symptoms resolved following discontinuation of amphotericin B. After rechallenge, the rash rapidly reappeared, suggesting a strong association.

Antituberculous therapy There are a number of case reports of eosinophilia28-31 in patients on antituberculous therapy. However, as patients are often on multiple drug regimens, it can be difficult to pinpoint the causative agent.

There is a case report of ethambutol-induced pulmonary infiltrates with eosinophilia and a skin reaction.28 A woman aged 67 with tuberculosis was treated with streptomycin, isoniazid, rifampicin, ethambutol and pyrazinamide. After eight weeks of therapy she developed a blood eosinophilia with pulmonary infiltrates and a skin rash. Following rechallenge this was shown to be related to the ethambutol therapy.

Rifampicin has been reported to cause eosinophilia with both pulmonary and colitic complications.29,30 There are also reports of eosinophilia occurring in the presence of other drugs.31

One patient developed a peak eosinophil count of 5,500/mm3 and bilateral pulmonary infiltrates.29 The patient improved, and the eosinophilia disappeared within 18 days of stopping the rifampicin.

A case of eosinophilic colitis occurred in a patient started on quadruple therapy of ethambutol, rifampicin, isoniazid and pyrazinamide. Nine days after starting treatment she became pyrexial, and developed diarrhoea with the passage of fresh blood, nausea and vomiting with a colicky pain, and a generalised pruritic skin rash.30 Blood counts failed to reveal a significant peripheral blood eosinophilia. Colonic biopsy specimens showed a chronic inflammatory cell infiltrate, which included plasma cells, macrophages and eosinophils.

Following treatment with rectal prednisolone and cessation of antituberculous therapy, the rash and abdominal symptoms resolved within six days. Each of the drugs was reintroduced in turn, and following rifampicin therapy, the abdominal symptoms and rash reappeared. After rifampicin had been discontinued, the symptoms resolved within four days and did not reoccur for a period of three months while the patient was on isoniazid, ethambutol and pyrazinamide. The authors concluded there was substantial evidence of a causal relationship between rifampicin and eosinophilic colitis.

Cardiovascular drugs

ACE inhibitors Eosinophilia is a frequent side effect during captopril therapy, but it rarely requires discontinuation of therapy. Dermal and pulmonary complications are most likely to require discontinuation, although some allergic reactions improve if the captopril dose is reduced.32 There is a case report of captopril causing pulmonary infiltration with eosinophilia.33 The patient developed diffuse lung field infiltrates with a productive cough and a marked peripheral eosinophilia. The symptoms disappeared after captopril had been discontinued.

Enalapril has been reported to cause a pruritic rash associated with eosinophilia.34 The rash resolved seven days after enalapril was discontinued. Cross-sensitivity did not appear to be a problem, as the rash was not noted when the patient was started on captopril.

There is a case of perindopril causing pneumonitis associated with bronchial wall eosinophilic infiltration.35 The symptoms, which included fever, dry cough and dyspnoea, developed after the patient had been taking perindopril for six months. Following perindopril withdrawal and corticosteroid therapy, there was a marked clinical improvement. After rechallenge with a single perindopril tablet seven months later, fever, cough and dyspnoea reappeared.

Dermal and pulmonary complications of eosinophilia have been reported with at least three ACE inhibitors, and it seems likely this is a class effect. Clinicians should be aware of this. In one case, the diagnosis was confirmed by rechallenge.

Spironolactone There are two cases of spironolactone causing a severe eosinophilia with an erythematous macular rash.36 In both cases, the rash developed within 12 hours of spironolactone being commenced, and withdrawal of the drug resulted in a slow resolution of the eosinophilia and rash. Although a rechallenge was not undertaken, the authors suggested that spironolactone caused the rash and eosinophilia via a type I allergic reaction.

Calcium channel blockers There is a case report of a patient who developed a fever, relative eosinophilia and a pruritic maculopapular rash following treatment with diltiazem.37 The symptoms resolved once diltiazem had been discontinued; unfortunately, however, rechallenge could not be conducted.

Anti-arrhythmic drugs Eosinophilia has been reported with quinidine.11 There have been rare reports of eosinophilia in patients taking cardiac glycosides, occasionally with a cutaneous reaction.38

Methyldopa Methyldopa has been implicated in the potentially fatal condition of hypersensitivity myocarditis.39 While a raised eosinophilia count is usually observed, the presenting symptom has included headache, malaise or nausea.14

CNS drugs

Antipsychotics Eosinophilia, which may be dramatic, is a reported side effect of chlorpromazine,5,40 although it is often asymptomatic and disappears even if chlorpromazine therapy is continued.

There is one reported case of pulmonary infiltrations with eosinophilia that became apparent three weeks after chlorpromazine had been commenced. Symptoms included a fever and a non-productive cough.5 A chest X-ray showed streaky right lobe densities with a possible small pleural effusion, while the white blood cell count increased to 21,000/mm3 with 53 per cent eosinophils. After chlorpromazine was discontinued, the symptoms resolved and the eosinophil count gradually fell. Following rechallenge with chlorpromazine, the eosinophil count once again climbed.

Antidepressants Antidepressants are not commonly associated with eosinophilia. Occasionally a transient eosinophilia occurs with tricyclic antidepressants during the first few weeks of therapy, although this is not thought to be clinically significant.41 There are a few reports related to desipramine and imipramine,42,43 and a case of eosinophilia and jaundice in a patient treated with amitriptyline.44 There is also a case report of eosinophilic pneumonia (confirmed by bronchoalveolar lavage) and respiratory failure associated with trazodone overdose.43

Tryptophan, which is used as an antidepressant and a dietary supplement, has been implicated in causing a potentially fatal eosinophilia-myalgia syndrome (EMS).45 The characteristic features are a raised eosinophilia count (>2,000/mm3), severe myalgia, oedema and a rash.46 However, other parts of the body, including the liver and the central nervous system, may be involved.46

In patients who develop the syndrome, tryptophan should be discontinued. There is, however, usually only a gradual improvement. There have been a number of fatalities,47 with ascending polyneuropathy with paralysis and respiratory failure cited as the main cause of death.48 The syndrome is often chronic, with most patients reporting EMS to be having a major impact on their lifestyle 3.6 years after onset.45 The main chronic symptoms of EMS are neurological and musculoskeletal.49 The cause of the syndrome appears to be related to a contaminant in the bulk manufacturing process of a single Japanese company.45

Anticonvulsants Phenobarbitone, carbamazepine and phenytoin have been implicated in severe, multisystem, potentially life threatening eosinophilic reactions, the incidence of which is approximately one in 1,000 to one in 10,000.50 Symptoms include skin rash, fever, haematologic abnormalities (including eosinophilia), hepatotoxicity, lymphadenopathy and sometimes pneumonitis.50 Cardiac complications have also been reported.39,51

A case is described of a 13-year-old boy who died of uncontrollable cardiac dysrhythmias two months after the start of carbamazepine therapy.51 Eosinophilia was first noted 17 days after carbamazepine had been started and the symptoms, which mimicked scarlet fever, included fever, rash, conjunctivitis, hepatitis and myocarditis. When the myocardium was examined at autopsy, severe eosinophilic myocarditis was noted. The authors suggested a diagnosis of eosinophilic myocarditis should be considered if fever, rash and eosinophilia occur after carbamazepine has been commenced. A case of eosinophilic myocarditis has also been reported in a patient taking both phenytoin and carbamazepine.39

There are also cases of phenytoin induced pulmonary eosinophilia,52 including a case of L?ffler’s syndrome53 which may have been caused by phenytoin. In one case, the symptoms included fever, diffuse bronchical wheezing and both sputum and peripheral blood eosinophilia.52 The patient developed acute renal and hepatic failure, and also respiratory failure, which required mechanical ventilation in addition to high-dose corticosteroids. The patient fully recovered.

In the patient who developed L?ffler’s syndrome, the symptoms included elevated liver function tests, a skin rash with mucosal involvement and an elevated white blood cell count including eosinophilia and cervical lymphadenopathy. The syndrome developed weeks after phenytoin had been commenced and resolved on discontinuation. Concurrently, the patient had also been taking phenobarbitone. Similar symptoms developed after carbamazepine had been started, and the authors concluded there been had cross-sensitivity to carbamazepine.53

Valproic acid has also been associated with a case of eosinophilic pleural effusion and a peripheral blood eosinophilia.54 When valproic acid therapy was stopped, the pleural effusion and eosinophilia resolved, so the authors claimed an association.

Antirheumatic drugs

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) A number of different NSAIDs have been reported to induce respiratory disease associated with eosinophilia,55?57 and it seems likely this is a class effect. The reported agents include naproxen, fenoprofen, sulindac, diclofenac, piroxicam, azapropazone and diflunisal.55-57 One source states the most frequently implicated agents are naproxen and azapropazone.55 Another source states the incidence of eosinophilia with pulmonary infiltrates is greater with naproxen than ibuprofen.56 It is impossible to determine categorically which of the NSAIDs causes the greatest risk, because it is likely that the syndrome is under-reported. The most common symptoms and signs include fever, dyspnoea, cough, infiltrates on chest roentgenogram and an absolute peripheral eosinophilia.56 Generalised rashes, malaise, a sputum eosinophilia, leukocytosis and an elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate are also common.55

If eosinophilic pneumonia develops, the causative NSAID should be withdrawn. Most patients recover within two weeks.57 While the course of the syndrome is usually relatively benign, it has been reported to cause residual pulmonary fibrosis and there has been a death reported.55

There is also a case of eosinophilic meningitis associated with ibuprofen therapy.58 A patient presented with meningeal symptoms, including severe bifrontal headache, photophobia, nausea and a stiff neck, 48 hours after she had started taking ibuprofen 400mg orally three times a day. There was no eosinophilia in the peripheral blood, but the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) showed a marked eosinophilic response. Ibuprofen was discontinued: the meningeal symptoms resolved, and repeated CSF examinations showed decreasing numbers of eosinophils. The authors concluded that the eosinophilic meningitis was drug induced, but the only way to confirm this would be rechallenge.

Indomethacin has been reported to cause an acute renal failure associated with eosinophilia.11

Gold Routine gold therapy may lead to eosinophilia. One study found that 47 per cent of patients on intramuscular gold with a diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis developed eosinophilia.59 The most common manifestation of the eosinophilia was a dermal reaction. However, the authors note that eosinophilia does occur in patients with rheumatoid arthritis not treated with gold.

Another study found eosinophilia, which was usually mild, occurred in only 21 per cent of patients receiving intramuscular gold and 14 per cent of patients receiving oral gold.60 A further study also suggested that eosinophilia, which occurred in 26 per cent of patients, was rarely associated with toxicity.61

Gold therapy has also been associated with both eosinophilia pulmonary disease and eosinophilic colitis.59,62 In one case of eosinophilic colitis, the patient became asymptomatic after intramuscular gold therapy had been discontinued and treatment with cromoglycate commenced.63

Gastrointestinal drugs

Histamine receptor antagonists Ranitidine has been reported to cause eosinophilic pneumonia.64 A patient was admitted to hospital 25 days after 150mg of ranitidine twice daily had been started, with symptoms of facial oedema, dyspnoea and a non-productive cough. The peripheral white blood cell count was 7,660 per mm3 (with 13 per cent eosinophils).

Auscultation of the lungs showed diffuse bilateral expiratory sibilus and basal hypophonesis. A diagnosis of atypical pneumonia was suspected and treatment with antibiotics commenced. However, after three days, no evidence of an infectious disease could be detected and the patient’s condition was worsening. A diagnosis of hypersensitivity pneumonia was, therefore, suspected. The antibiotics and ranitidine were discontinued and treatment with prednisolone was started. The patient improved rapidly and within three days he was completely asymptomatic with a normal peripheral white blood cell count. The authors concluded that, although without rechallenge, it was impossible to completely prove a cause-effect relationship, it was likely that the acute eosinophilic pneumonia was a hypersensitivity reaction associated with ranitidine.

A case of thrombocytopenia and eosinophilia associated with ranitidine has been reported.65 A raised eosinophilia count was first noted two weeks after ranitidine 300mg daily was initiated and resolved after it had been discontinued.

Cimetidine has also been reported to cause eosinophilia, which was confirmed by rechallenge.66

Proton pump inhibitors Eosinophilia has been reported with both lansoprazole and omeprazole.67,68 It is possible that this is a class effect, although the clinical presentation varied. A patient on omeprazole therapy presented with non-oliguric acute renal failure.68 Eosinophilia and eosinophiluria appeared after one month of omeprazole therapy; fever and skin rash were not detected. A diagnosis of drug-associated interstitial nephritis was made. The renal failure and eosinophiluria resolved spontaneously when omeprazole was discontinued. Unfortunately, there was no record of whether the eosinophilia resolved. A rechallenge was not conducted.

There is a case of an eosinophilia and myalgia related syndrome to lansoprazole use.67 A 50-year-old white woman developed myalgia seven days after lansoprazole was initiated. Both the myalgia and the eosinophilia that was noted later resolved 40 days after lansoprazole was discontinued. The patient also received prednisone therapy. The authors noted the patient fulfilled diagnostic criteria for both eosinophilia-myalgia syndrome and eosinophilia fasciitis. They concluded that although other causes could not be eliminated the time scale implicated lansoprazole. A rechallenge was not, however, conducted.

Aminosalicylates Sulphasalazine22,69 and mesalazine70 have been reported to cause eosinophilia with pulmonary complications. There is a case report of an eosinophilic pneumonia and skin rash in a 21-year-old man on sulphasalazine.69 After the drug had been discontinued, and treatment with steroids started, the rash and pulmonary infiltrates completely resolved.

There is a report of a patient who developed shortness of breath nine months after oral mesalazine had been initiated.70 Findings, such as a peripheral eosinophilia, a low grade fever and bilateral pulmonary infiltrates, were consistent with a diagnosis of eosinophilic lung disease. The patient made a complete recovery following steroid therapy and discontinuation of mesalazine.

Other drugs

Chlorpropamide Chlorpropamide, a sulphonylurea, has been reported to cause pulmonary disease with eosinophilic infiltration.71 Chronic eosinophilic pneumonia has also been described during chlorpropamide therapy.11 In one case, when other symptoms included nausea, vomiting, pruritus, a maculopapular rash and elevated hepatic enzymes, the symptoms of dyspnoea and hypoxemia were so severe that artificial respiration was required.72

Cholestyramine Cholestyramine has been reported to be associated with eosinophilia in a five-week old baby who had persistent diarrhoea.73 The eosinophilia, which the report suggested was due to systemic absorption, appeared to be dose-dependent and not associated with any other abnormalities.

Heparin There have been rare cases of hypereosinophilia with positive rechallenge associated with heparin reported in the French literature.11
From Spain there is a report of eosinophilia in a 66-year-old patient treated with enoxaparin at a dose of 40mg every day for seven days.74


If the eosinophilia is mild, transient and asymptomatic, there is no need to take action. If, however, the eosinophilia is more severe and producing symptoms, the most important management step is to discontinue any agent that may have caused the reaction.

Eosinophilia usually occurs within eight weeks of any medicine being started, so agents started in this period should be discontinued initially. Symptoms have been reported to develop up to five years after initiation of a medicine.9 Patients usually recover after the offending drug is withdrawn. It is also important to treat any renal, hepatic, pulmonary, CNS or any other complications of the eosinophilia.

Corticosteroids are often used, but there are no placebo controlled trials assessing their effectiveness and their role is not clear. Some sources suggest they have little benefit and no effect on outcomes,56,70 while others suggest that they produce a more rapid response.50,55 It has been suggested that corticosteroids should be reserved for more serious reactions.55 Corticosteroids are sometimes not prescribed because of concern about an infection causing the eosinophilia.57

There is also some debate about the dose required. There are reports of doses between 10?100mg prednisone being used.41 Generally, high doses tend to be used; for example, daily doses of 60?90mg of prednisone or prednisolone have been used to treat NSAID-induced eosinophilic pneumonia.55,75 There are reports of 30?40mg daily of prednisone being used to treat the mainly pulmonary symptoms of minocycline- or tetracycline-induced eosinophilia.23,76 In one case, there were persistent dermal complications which required more prolonged treatment with prednisone.23

Additionally, there is no clear consensus on the duration of corticosteroid therapy. Most patients receive two to six weeks’ treatment, although much longer courses have also been recommended and used. It has been reported that stopping steroid therapy, particularly in patients with chronic eosinophilia, may result in relapse.77 These patients sometimes require long-term corticosteroids.9

Intravenous methylprednisolone at a dose of 50mg daily has been used to treat the symptoms of eosinophilia.19 There is a report of high dose intravenous methylprednisolone (125mg every four hours) being used.52 There is, however, no evidence that methylprednisolone is more effective than oral corticosteroid therapy.

Immunosuppressive therapy, such as azathioprine, hydroxyurea and cyclophosphamide has also been recommended.39,78 It has been suggested that hydroxyurea is particularly useful in life-threatening hypereosinophilia.3 Some sources, however, question the benefit of such agents.41 Antihistamines have also been used.12

There is also a report of oral sodium cromoglicate being used successfully to treat gold-induced eosinophilic enterocolitis.63 The patient received 20mg four times a day for about six weeks.


Literature on drug-induced eosinophilia is sparse and mainly consists of individual case reports. It is often impossible to confirm whether the eosinophilia is truly drug induced because ethical and practical considerations make rechallenge unwarranted. It is also highly probable that the syndrome is misdiagnosed and under-reported.

The condition often appears to be a class effect, and the groups of drugs most commonly implicated include NSAIDs, antimalarials, anti-epileptics, some antibiotics and drugs for tuberculosis.

Of the more recently licensed drugs, both ACE inhibitors and proton pump inhibitors appear to be associated with eosinophilia. Although there are not many documented cases, dermal and pulmonary complications of eosinophilia have been reported with at least three ACE inhibitors, although cross-sensitivity may not occur. More data are required on proton pump inhibitor-induced eosinophilia.

The severity varies greatly; anticonvulsants appear to be associated with a potentially life threatening reaction. The organs most often affected appear to be the lungs and the skin, although the CNS, kidney, gastrointestinal system, heart and musculosketetal system can also be affected.

Awareness of this potentially fatal condition needs to be raised to ensure prompt diagnosis. If eosinophilia develops, treatment usually consists of withdrawing the probable causative drug. Corticosteroids are often used, but their role in the management of this condition is controversial.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT The authors acknowledge the assistance of Dr F. Brito-Babapulle, consultant haematologist at the Royal Berkshire hospital, Reading.

Mr Maidment is clinical pharmacist, Hellesdon hospital, Norwich, and Ms Williams is clinical pharmacist, Royal Hampshire County hospital, Winchester. Correspondence to Mr Maidment at Pharmacy Department, Hellesdon Hospital, Drayton High Road, Norwich NR6 5BE


Reading this article counts towards your CPD

You can use the following forms to record your learning and action points from this article from Pharmaceutical Journal Publications.

Your CPD module results are stored against your account here at The Pharmaceutical Journal. You must be registered and logged into the site to do this. To review your module results, go to the ‘My Account’ tab and then ‘My CPD’.

Any training, learning or development activities that you undertake for CPD can also be recorded as evidence as part of your RPS Faculty practice-based portfolio when preparing for Faculty membership. To start your RPS Faculty journey today, access the portfolio and tools at

If your learning was planned in advance, please click:

If your learning was spontaneous, please click:

Citation: The Pharmaceutical Journal URI: 20000049

Rate this article  (4.33 average user rating)

Click to rate

  • 1 star out of 5
  • 2 stars out of 5
  • 3 stars out of 5
  • 4 stars out of 5
  • 5 stars out of 5

0 out of 5 stars

Have your say

For commenting, please login or register as a user and agree to our Community Guidelines. You will be re-directed back to this page where you will have the ability to comment.

Recommended from Pharmaceutical Press

  • Drugs of Abuse

    Drugs of Abuse

    A concise, easy-to-read guide for healthcare professionals who encounter drug abuse.

    £38.00Buy now
  • Pharmaceutical Toxicology

    Pharmaceutical Toxicology

    Explains the methodology and requirements of pre-clinical safety assessments of new medicines. Includes registration requirements and pharmacovigilance.

    £40.00Buy now
  • Workplace Drug Testing

    Workplace Drug Testing

    Explains drug testing regulatory frameworks and all aspects of drug analysis. Case studies of successful programmes are included.

    £81.00Buy now
  • Drugs and the Liver

    Drugs and the Liver

    Drugs and the Liver assists practitioners in making pragmatic choices for their patients. It enables you to assess liver function and covers the principles of drug use in liver disease.

    £38.00Buy now
  • Clarke's Analysis of Drugs and Poisons

    Clarke's Analysis of Drugs and Poisons

    Clarke's Analysis of Drugs and Poisons is the definitive reference source of analytical data for drugs and poisons.

    £535.00Buy now
  • Print
  • Share
  • Comment
  • Rate
  • Save
  • Print Friendly Version of this pagePrint Get a PDF version of this webpagePDF

Newsletter Sign-up

Want to keep up with the latest news, comment and CPD articles in pharmacy and science? Subscribe to our free alerts.