Cookie policy: This site uses cookies (small files stored on your computer) to simplify and improve your experience of this website. Cookies are small text files stored on the device you are using to access this website. For more information please take a look at our terms and conditions. Some parts of the site may not work properly if you choose not to accept cookies.

Join

Subscribe or Register

Existing user? Login

PDA Union makes "incompatibility" application in Boots bid

The Pharmacists’ Defence Association Union has made the next move to increase its chances of representing Boots’ pharmacists over pay and holidays, known as collective bargaining.

The PDAU filed a request this week (11 February 2014) with the High Court to declare that UK trade union law is incompatible with the European Convention on Human Rights. It had been invited to make the “declaration of incompatibility” application in an interim decision made by the judge presiding over a judicial review brought by Boots (made on 22 January 2014). Boots has rejected the PDAU’s bid for statutory recognition for collective bargaining, preferring to work with another union — the Boots Pharmacists Association.

According to David Reissner, partner and head of healthcare at law firm Charles Russell, a declaration of incompatibility does not change the law of itself, but it provides a clear flag to Parliament that there is an issue to be resolved. “However, until Parliament takes steps to change the legislation the parties would be unaffected by any such declaration and, therefore, at present the parties are bound by the judicial review decision,” he told PJ Online last month.

John Murphy, the general secretary of the PDAU, believes the PDAU’s efforts can lay the groundwork for a change in British law that will “strengthen all workers’ rights to an independent voice at work”.

IDS, a research organisation that analyses employment issues, says in an “law brief” on the case: “If a declaration were to be made, the Government would be under political pressure, though not obliged, to amend the legislation.”

Citation: The Pharmaceutical Journal DOI: 10.1211/PJ.2014.11134346

Have your say

For commenting, please login or register as a user and agree to our Community Guidelines. You will be re-directed back to this page where you will have the ability to comment.

Recommended from Pharmaceutical Press

Search an extensive range of the world’s most trusted resources

Powered by MedicinesComplete
  • Print
  • Share
  • Comment
  • Save
  • Print Friendly Version of this pagePrint Get a PDF version of this webpagePDF

Supplementary images

  • Boots logo

Newsletter Sign-up

Want to keep up with the latest news, comment and CPD articles in pharmacy and science? Subscribe to our free alerts.