Cookie policy: This site uses cookies (small files stored on your computer) to simplify and improve your experience of this website. Cookies are small text files stored on the device you are using to access this website. For more information please take a look at our terms and conditions. Some parts of the site may not work properly if you choose not to accept cookies.

Join

Subscribe or Register

Existing user? Login

Clinical research

Inotuzumab ozogamicin improves chances in patients with relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukaemia

Researchers discover how new antibody drug conjugate was able to increase the number of patients able to undergo potentially curative stem cell transplant.

Bone marrow lymphoblasts show block and coarse granular staining

Source: Wikimedia Commons / The Armed Forces Institute of Pathology

Researchers found that the new treatment can help patients with acute lympoblastic leukaemia that has gone into remission prepare for a transplant

Patients with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) that has relapsed after treatment are almost four times as likely to go into remission and have a potentially curative stem cell transplant following treatment with a new antibody drug conjugate.

In the phase III trial, sponsored by Pfizer, 326 patients with relapsed or refractory ALL, an aggressive cancer that starts in the bone marrow and has a high relapse rate, were randomly assigned to receive either inotuzumab ozogamicin or standard intensive chemotherapy.

With standard treatments, the chance of achieving remission is low once patients have relapsed, but the researchers found that 80.7% of relapsed patients given inotuzumab ozogamicin went into complete remission compared with 29.4% treated with standard therapy (P<0.001). Some 41% of patients in the inotuzumab ozogamicin group went on to have an allogenic stem cell transplant, compared with 11% of patients given standard chemotherapy (P<0.001).

Even after transplant, ALL can come back again, but the results show that it took longer on average for the disease to return in the inotuzumab ozogamicin group: 5.0 months compared with 1.8 months in the standard treatment group.

Reporting the results in The New England Journal of Medicine[1] (online, 12 June 2016), lead author Hagop Kantarjian, from the Universtiy of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, says: “Given that stem cell transplant is considered the only curative treatment option [for ALL], the ability of inotuzumab ozogamicin to increase the number of patients able to bridge to transplant is encouraging.”

Median survival was 7.7 months in the inotuzumab ozogamicin group compared with 6.7 months in the standard treatment group. And in an analysis of overall survival at two years, 23% of patients in the inotuzumab ozogamicin group had survived compared with 10% in the standard therapy group (P=0.04).

Inotuzumab ozogamicin is a novel type of therapy that is increasingly being used to treat cancer. It links a targeted monoclonal antibody to a toxic drug. The monoclonal antibody in inotuzumab ozogamicin targets a glycoprotein on the surface of cells called CD22, which is expressed in 90% of patients with B-cell ALL. Once the monoclonal antibody reaches the targeted cells it is internalised and releases calicheamicin, a toxic drug that kills the cell.

Peter Johnson, chief clinician at Cancer Research UK, who was not involved in the study, says: “Acute lymphoblastic leukaemia that comes back after chemotherapy is difficult to treat. Bone marrow transplants are the best hope for these patients, but the leukaemia must be controlled first before having a transplant.”

He adds that “the good news is this treatment may be one way to help patients into remission ready for a transplant”.

“Although it’s not a cure on its own, it could be a useful pre-treatment that helps more leukaemia patients have life-saving bone marrow transplants.”

The most serious side effect observed in the clinical trial was veno-occlusive liver disease, which occurred in 11% of patients in the inotuzumab ozogamicin group compared with 1% in the standard treatment group.

Citation: The Pharmaceutical Journal DOI: 10.1211/PJ.2016.20201306

Have your say

For commenting, please login or register as a user and agree to our Community Guidelines. You will be re-directed back to this page where you will have the ability to comment.

Recommended from Pharmaceutical Press

  • Drugs of Abuse

    Drugs of Abuse

    A concise, easy-to-read guide for healthcare professionals who encounter drug abuse.

    £38.00Buy now
  • Pharmaceutical Toxicology

    Pharmaceutical Toxicology

    Explains the methodology and requirements of pre-clinical safety assessments of new medicines. Includes registration requirements and pharmacovigilance.

    £40.00Buy now
  • Sport and Exercise Medicine for Pharmacists

    Sport and Exercise Medicine for Pharmacists

    All the information you need to provide patients with evidence-based advice on sports and exercise related health matters.

    £27.00Buy now
  • Adverse Drug Reactions

    Adverse Drug Reactions

    A practical guide to the drug reactions that affect particular organ systems, and the management of these reactions.

    £38.00Buy now
  • English Delftware Drug Jars

    English Delftware Drug Jars

    This beautiful book illustrates the art and history of the collection of English delftware drug jars in the Museum of the Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain.

    £54.00Buy now

Search an extensive range of the world’s most trusted resources

Powered by MedicinesComplete
  • Print
  • Share
  • Comment
  • Save
  • Print Friendly Version of this pagePrint Get a PDF version of this webpagePDF

Supplementary images

  • Bone marrow lymphoblasts show block and coarse granular staining

Jobs you might like

Newsletter Sign-up

Want to keep up with the latest news, comment and CPD articles in pharmacy and science? Subscribe to our free alerts.