Cookie policy: This site uses cookies (small files stored on your computer) to simplify and improve your experience of this website. Cookies are small text files stored on the device you are using to access this website. For more information please take a look at our terms and conditions. Some parts of the site may not work properly if you choose not to accept cookies.


Subscribe or Register

Existing user? Login

NHS England

Money for NHS transformation spent on cutting deficits, NAO finds

According to the National Audit Office, money intended to enable vanguard programme has been spent on relieving short-term financial pressures in the NHS. 

An NHS England scheme to use new models of care to better meet patients’ needs and make savings has failed to achieve its aims, a report by the National Audit Office

The report, published on 29 June 2018, says the vanguard programme, which also set out to integrate health and social care services, had “not delivered the depth and scale of transformed services it aimed for at the beginning of the programme”.

It added that money intended to enable the initiative to transform services was instead spent on helping to relieve short-term financial pressures in the NHS by reducing trusts’ financial deficits.

When it was first launched in 2015, one of the vanguard programme’s main objectives was to design new care models that could be quickly replicated across England. NHS England chose 50 sites to act as ‘vanguards’ that might involve, for example, joining up general practice, hospital, community and mental health services in an integrated network or single organisation in one area to improve healthcare for patients.

NHS England’s early planning assumption was £2.2bn of funding for new care models between 2016–2017 and 2020–2021, but it used much of the funding to reduce deficits faced by hospital trusts, the NAO said.

Amyas Morse, comptroller and auditor general at the NAO, said: “The vanguard programme is one of a series of attempts to transform the NHS. Its progress has been mixed but there are some early signs of a positive impact.”

Citation: The Pharmaceutical Journal DOI: 10.1211/PJ.2018.20205090

Have your say

For commenting, please login or register as a user and agree to our Community Guidelines. You will be re-directed back to this page where you will have the ability to comment.

Recommended from Pharmaceutical Press

Search an extensive range of the world’s most trusted resources

Powered by MedicinesComplete
  • Print
  • Share
  • Comment
  • Save
  • Print Friendly Version of this pagePrint Get a PDF version of this webpagePDF

Supplementary images

  • NHS signage

Jobs you might like

Newsletter Sign-up

Want to keep up with the latest news, comment and CPD articles in pharmacy and science? Subscribe to our free alerts.