Cookie policy: This site uses cookies (small files stored on your computer) to simplify and improve your experience of this website. Cookies are small text files stored on the device you are using to access this website. For more information please take a look at our terms and conditions. Some parts of the site may not work properly if you choose not to accept cookies.


Subscribe or Register

Existing user? Login


Pharmacists respond to Keith Ridge's claims

Keith Ridge’s speech at the recent Royal Pharmaceutical Society’s annual conference in Birmingham has sparked a lively debate with some pharmacists calling for more funding to implement proposed changes.



Source: Royal Pharmaceutical Society

Keith Ridge’s speech at the Royal Pharmaceutical Society conference in Birmingham on 4 September has had a mixed response from pharmacists.

Pharmacists have offered a mixed response to claims by Keith Ridge, the chief pharmaceutical officer for England, that pharmacy needs to “up its game”.

Ridge made the statement during his speech at the Royal Pharmaceutical Society’s (RPS) annual conference in Birmingham on 4 September 2017.

While acknowledging “much good practice” across the sector, he told delegates there remained “serious problems in respect to the quality of medicines use”, highlighting polypharmacy, issues around adherence, medication errors and unnecessary antimicrobial use.

“Sometimes”, he said, “it can look like pharmacy is not open to change.”

In an open message to Ridge published in response to The Pharmaceutical Journal’s report of the speech, Joseph Schofield, a community pharmacist, said: “In the current climate of reduced funding, a delayed and watered down Pharmacy Integration Fund, cut backs in local commissioning and diminishing chance of being commissioned, is it not time for you and your team to up your game?

“We want to change in all the ways you want us to change. What are you going to do about it?”

Other pharmacists agreed that more funding was needed. Mike Hewitson, an independent pharmacy contractor and member of the NPA and PSNC boards, said that “upping the game” was “difficult to do … while cutting back on service in every area”.

Hewitson added that while he did not disagree with Ridge’s statement that there were problems with medicines use, “his strategy has only made the problem worse. Quality Payments are nothing more than a box-ticking exercise.”

Responding to the same statement, Tim Harrington said: “Totally agree but good quality comes at a price. KR’s failed policy to close pharmacies is unhelpful.”

Dezzy, a pharmacist, said that the “DoH needs to ‘up pharmacy’s funding’ so it has the resources to ‘up its game’.

But Sammu Dhaliwall, a Canadian pharmacist, showed support for Ridge. In response to Ridge’s comment that “the quality expected simply can’t be delivered if we remain tied up in old ways of working,” Dhaliwall said: “Keith has vision! Hope we see similar actions in Canada.”

Robbie Turner, RPS director for England, said: “We welcome the new focus from NHS England on medicines safety and quality and look forward to working with them on this with colleagues from across the profession. We are confident that pharmacists in every sector will continue to work their hardest for their patients and deliver quality services wherever they practise.

“At our annual conference this week, the audience welcomed comments by the minister that we need sustainable funding to enable pharmacy contractors to invest in the future and further improve the quality of their services, but the shockwave that has run through community pharmacy as a result of the reforms cannot be ignored.

“We will of course work to support our colleagues however we can.”

Citation: The Pharmaceutical Journal DOI: 10.1211/PJ.2017.20203552

Readers' comments (2)

  • Hardly a mixed response when the only support for Mr Ridge comes from a Canadian pharmacist who is probably not familiar with Mr Ridge's recent actions rather than words. i.e. cutting funding and quoting spurious evidence to support his "vision" for pharmacy.
    I think we are coming close to a time when pharmacists working in the community sector might be thinking of asking for a vote of no confidence in Mr Ridge as the Chief Pharmacist for England.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Vision? He does indeed and most of us share it. However there exist no mechanisms, no will amongst commissioners, no will from NHSE, no accessible funding to enable it to happen and actually large cuts in funding meaning reduced resource to achieve anything worthwhile whilst putting up with spiteful comments about upping the game. In Canada you aren't dependent on a monopoly supplier and you have significant innovation particularly in accreditation of pharmacists. Don't slag off what you have....if indeed whilst sticking your nose into English affairs you are actually aware of what you have in Canada?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

For commenting, please login or register as a user and agree to our Community Guidelines. You will be re-directed back to this page where you will have the ability to comment.

Recommended from Pharmaceutical Press

  • Print
  • Share
  • Comment
  • Save
  • Print Friendly Version of this pagePrint Get a PDF version of this webpagePDF

Supplementary images

  • Keith Ridge chief pharmaceutical officer

Newsletter Sign-up

Want to keep up with the latest news, comment and CPD articles in pharmacy and science? Subscribe to our free alerts.