Cookie policy: This site uses cookies (small files stored on your computer) to simplify and improve your experience of this website. Cookies are small text files stored on the device you are using to access this website. For more information please take a look at our terms and conditions. Some parts of the site may not work properly if you choose not to accept cookies.


Subscribe or Register

Existing user? Login


Pharmacists 'unqualified' to follow government drug-switching protocols, say legal campaigners

The Good Law Project stated to the Court of Appeals that pharmacists are “unqualified” to dispense alternate drugs during medicines shortages.

Sir Stephen Richards PAImages19

Source: Clara Molden/PA Archive/PA Images

Sir Stephen Richards, former Lord Justice of Appeal, recommended rejecting the appeal, saying that The Good Law Project’s arguments were “not at all persuasive”

A legal campaign group has said pharmacists are “unqualified” to dispense alternative medicines during shortages in line with a government-issued protocol.

The Good Law Project, which launched its campaign for a judicial review of serious shortage protocol legislation in February 2019, has appealed the High Court’s decision to refuse permission for a judicial review to go ahead.

In its skeleton argument document, submitted to the Court of Appeal for a hearing on 10 May 2019, The Good Law project said the legislation allowing pharmacists to follow a government protocol to supply a different medicine to the one prescribed during a shortage “poses obvious dangers” to patients as pharmacists are “not qualified properly to assess” patients before dispensing.

It said that the legislation, which came into force on 9 February 2019, “allows an existing clinical judgment made by qualified persons (doctors and other properly qualified professional persons) to be substituted or interfered with by an unqualified person (a pharmacist)”.

The argument continued that “each and every pharmacist may supply a prescription-only medicine to a patient they know little or nothing about, do not have the means to assess and are not qualified properly to assess”.

However, Sir Stephen Richards, former Lord Justice of Appeal, recommended rejecting the appeal in his concluding remarks at the hearing on 10 May 2019, saying a judicial review “would have no real prospect of success and permission for appeal should for that reason be refused”.

He added that The Good Law Project’s arguments were “unarguable” and “not at all persuasive”.

“Where there is a prescription that the pharmacist, for whatever reason, sells the patient a different medicine, parliament must have intended that to be a salient pursuance of prescription,” he explained.

“Parliament cannot have had in contemplation, or have intended to authorise, an instrument interposing itself between the doctor’s prescription and the pharmacist’s sale rendering the prescription a dead letter, rendering irrelevant the professional opinion of the patient’s doctor as to what alternative medicine should have been prescribed.”

In a statement published after the hearing, the Good Law Project said this litigation was now “at an end”.

“Good Law Project made the decision to bring this case having had the benefit of advice from the leading practitioners and academics in the field,” the statement went on.

“The Court of Appeal agreed that it raised important public interest issues.”

Under the new legislation the government can now issue protocols asking pharmacists to respond to a medicines shortage in one of four ways: to dispense a reduced quantity, a therapeutic equivalent, a generic equivalent or an alternative dosage form of the drug, without having consulted with a patient’s GP.

Citation: The Pharmaceutical Journal DOI: 10.1211/PJ.2019.20206522

Readers' comments (2)

  • The Good Law Project does not understand how Pharmacists are trained and they also fail to recognise that Pharmacist are more than capable of making effective decisions regarding medicines and substitution in the event of shortages.
    Please note every day Pharmacist are advising Doctors and other health professionals regarding safe use of medicines. We are the the experts in this field.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The RPS should have its say on behalf of all pharmacists. Clearly Stephen Richards is out of his depths to understand the level of education of a pharmacist and so is the most inappropriate person to comment such gibberish. As it happens to be this change of medication to alternatives happens every day in USA.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

For commenting, please login or register as a user and agree to our Community Guidelines. You will be re-directed back to this page where you will have the ability to comment.

Recommended from Pharmaceutical Press

Search an extensive range of the world’s most trusted resources

Powered by MedicinesComplete
  • Print
  • Share
  • Comment
  • Save
  • Print Friendly Version of this pagePrint Get a PDF version of this webpagePDF

Newsletter Sign-up

Want to keep up with the latest news, comment and CPD articles in pharmacy and science? Subscribe to our free alerts.