Cookie policy: This site uses cookies (small files stored on your computer) to simplify and improve your experience of this website. Cookies are small text files stored on the device you are using to access this website. For more information please take a look at our terms and conditions. Some parts of the site may not work properly if you choose not to accept cookies.

Join

Subscribe or Register

Existing user? Login

Community pharmacy services

Pharmacy bodies call for number of LPCs to be cut

In response to a review of England’s local pharmaceutical committees, pharmacy bodies agree that reducing their number would free up funding for other local services.

Malcolm Harrison, chief executive of the Company Chemists’ Association

Source: Charlie Milligan

The Company Chemists’ Association (CCA) has suggested a cutback from 69 local pharmaceutical committees to 38. Pictured: Malcolm Harrison, chief executive of the CCA

Pharmacy bodies have called for a reduction in the number of local pharmaceutical committees (LPCs) to reflect the changing structure of the NHS.

In response to a review of pharmacy representation commissioned jointly by England’s LPCs and the Pharmaceutical Services Negotiating Committee (PSNC), three pharmacy bodies said cutting back on the number of LPCs would provide value for money.

The Company Chemists’ Association (CCA) suggested that a cutback from 69 LPCs to 38, which it said would save £2.7m “from the operational cost of running the current network”.

“We are confident that fewer, stronger, local teams, that are directly connected, with improved co-ordination and support, would in turn be able to better support contractors as they engage with their local health systems,” said Malcolm Harrison, chief executive of the CCA in a statement sent to The Pharmaceutical Journal.

The Association of Independent Multiple Pharmacies (AIMp) has suggested reducing the number of LPCs to 45 “in line with the number of [sustainability and transformation partnerships] STPs”, adding that by setting “clear lines of accountability and KPIs … there will be savings made”.

The National Pharmacy Association (NPA) suggested a reduction of LPCs to between 40 and 50, which would feed into between 7 and 11 regional LPC hubs. 

However, in its response to the review, published on 29 January 2020, the NPA said reducing the number of LPCs “should not equate to a reduction in local capacity to support the general body of pharmacy contractors”.

“On the contrary, any monies released from structural efficiencies should be reinvested to support local activity,” it added.

“This includes investing in a programme of support for the newly selected 1,259 pharmacy primary care network (PCN) leads.”

In October 2019, NHS England published plans to incentivise community pharmacists working in a PCN by nominating a lead pharmacist by 31 March 2020.

Commenting on the review in a personal capacity, Nick Kaye, who is associate chief officer at Cornwall and Isles of Scilly LPC and a board member at the NPA, said he supports “matching LPCs to NHS structures”.

He added that while responses suggesting scaling up to STP level “is helpful, I do think then that that funding should be redistributed back to support local [services at a PCN level]”.

Michael Keen, chief executive officer of Kingston and Richmond LPC, said the impact on the average community pharmacy of reducing the number of LPCs would be “significant if we go to the suggested regionalisation of representation”.

He added that suggestions of financial savings linked to reducing the number of LPCs “ignores the attention to detail, local relationships and local knowledge that will be required at a local level, within those regions”.

Citation: The Pharmaceutical Journal DOI: 10.1211/PJ.2020.20207695

Have your say

For commenting, please login or register as a user and agree to our Community Guidelines. You will be re-directed back to this page where you will have the ability to comment.

Recommended from Pharmaceutical Press

  • Print
  • Share
  • Comment
  • Save
  • Print Friendly Version of this pagePrint Get a PDF version of this webpagePDF

Jobs you might like

Newsletter Sign-up

Want to keep up with the latest news, comment and CPD articles in pharmacy and science? Subscribe to our free alerts.