Cookie policy: This site uses cookies (small files stored on your computer) to simplify and improve your experience of this website. Cookies are small text files stored on the device you are using to access this website. For more information please take a look at our terms and conditions. Some parts of the site may not work properly if you choose not to accept cookies.

Join

Subscribe or Register

Existing user? Login

Collision avoidance using optic flow

  • Print
  • Share
  • Comment
  • Save
  • Print Friendly Version of this pagePrint Get a PDF version of this webpagePDF

The news that driverless cars guided by sophisticated cameras and sensors are likely to appear on our roads in the not too distant future set me thinking about some of the methods that animals use to avoid bumping into each other and surrounding objects. That thought happened to coincide with the results of some research from Lund University in Sweden that compared how bumblebees (Bombus terrestris) and zebrafish (Danio rerio) use their in-built systems to avoid collisions.

Being able to regulate speed and judge distance accurately is a particular problem for creatures that fly or swim as they have to factor in the effects of variable wind or water currents as well as their own speed and direction. The researchers used tunnels containing air or water to compare the behaviour of the bumblebees or zebrafish. Inside the tunnels they employed black and white patterns to produce either strong horizontal optic flow cues on both walls, weak horizontal optic flow cues on both walls or a mixture of strong optic flow cues on some walls and weak optic flow cues on others.

Optic flow can be explained as the feeling we might have in a fast-moving vehicle whereupon we seem to be sitting still while the scenery appears to race past the window. The researchers showed that the closer the bumblebee or zebrafish came to an object, the faster that object seemed to move and that this apparent increase in speed strengthened the optic flow effect in the creature’s field of vision. They also found that although both bumblebees and zebrafish use optic flow to avoid collisions they use it in quite different ways.

Both species seem to be able to balance differing strengths of the optic flow registered by each of its eyes. If the optic flow suddenly became stronger in one eye compared to the other the creature reacted. However, the researchers were surprised to find that whereas the bees turned away from a stronger optic flow to avoid the risk of colliding with the object, the zebrafish moved closer to the strongest optic flow signal.

One explanation for the difference in behaviour might be that zebrafish live in a more turbid environment where the visibility may be limited to a few centimetres. Therefore although they need to avoid hitting the object, swimming too far away from it risks losing sight of a point of reference in their surroundings which would actually make it more difficult for them to decide on an appropriate speed and direction.

Have your say

For commenting, please login or register as a user and agree to our Community Guidelines. You will be re-directed back to this page where you will have the ability to comment.

  • Print
  • Share
  • Comment
  • Save
  • Print Friendly Version of this pagePrint Get a PDF version of this webpagePDF

From: Beyond pharmacy blog

Take a look here for thoughts and musings beyond the pharmacy realm

Newsletter Sign-up

Want to keep up with the latest news, comment and CPD articles in pharmacy and science? Subscribe to our free alerts.