Cookie policy: This site uses cookies (small files stored on your computer) to simplify and improve your experience of this website. Cookies are small text files stored on the device you are using to access this website. For more information please take a look at our terms and conditions. Some parts of the site may not work properly if you choose not to accept cookies.


Subscribe or Register

Existing user? Login


Exam failures help control pharmacist numbers

The news story on research that correlated lower entry standards and registration assessment failure rates (The Pharmaceutical Journal 2015;295:170) was interesting reading but little more.

The researchers did not follow individual students, only the schools that the cohort attended. There is a multitude of reasons why students fail the assessment, some of which I listed in a recent letter (The Pharmaceutical Journal 2015;294:631).

When I was marking some first-year MPharm resit papers, it caused me to reflect that 50 years ago at Chelsea School of Pharmacy (now King’s College London) there was a thinning out of both first-year and second-year students who failed the end-of-year examination and the subsequent resit, which resulted in no less than 25% of my fellow undergraduates being told to leave each year or repeat the year. This, I understand, rarely occurs now.

In addition, before 1965, students could opt to undertake their preregistration year before or after attending a school of pharmacy or, as I did, six months before and six months after. I fell in love with pharmacy immediately but if the reverse had occurred I could have changed my career path much more easily than nowadays.

Peter Noyce is absolutely spot on when he says in the news item that the failure of the exam is a serious issue financially and career-wise for the individuals concerned.

However, perhaps this phenomenon of failure is a good example of market forces, my favoured option, controlling the number of pharmacists entering the profession.

Barry Shooter

Bushey Heath


Citation: The Pharmaceutical Journal DOI: 10.1211/PJ.2015.20069313

Have your say

For commenting, please login or register as a user and agree to our Community Guidelines. You will be re-directed back to this page where you will have the ability to comment.

Recommended from Pharmaceutical Press

  • Print
  • Share
  • Comment
  • Save
  • Print Friendly Version of this pagePrint Get a PDF version of this webpagePDF

Jobs you might like

Newsletter Sign-up

Want to keep up with the latest news, comment and CPD articles in pharmacy and science? Subscribe to our free alerts.