Cookie policy: This site uses cookies (small files stored on your computer) to simplify and improve your experience of this website. Cookies are small text files stored on the device you are using to access this website. For more information please take a look at our terms and conditions. Some parts of the site may not work properly if you choose not to accept cookies.

Join

Subscribe or Register

Existing user? Login

sections

Patients should know who did the final check

I have had heated debates with dispensing staff about patients’ right to know if a pharmacist has performed the final check and bagged their medicines. Certainly, if I were a patient, I would like to know who is doing the final check of my medicines.

Therefore, those pharmacies who use accredited checking technicians (ACTs) to do final checks of prescriptions should inform patients before dispensing that the final check will be done by an ACT so that they can make an informed choice about to whether to have their prescription dispensed at that pharmacy.

Kiran Parikh

Wembley,

Middlesex

 

 

Citation: The Pharmaceutical Journal DOI: 10.1211/PJ.2015.20067607

Readers' comments (3)

  • Disagree. Provided the service is delivered safely, by qualified and trained staff then patient's need not be concerned. I do think that there ought to be an audit trail for the accuracy checking of supplied products, and this ought to be recorded on the patient's prescription document. This could coincide with a change to the legal accountability for dispensed medication accuracy - it's simply wrong that a Responsible Pharmacist is legally accountable for the accuracy of supplied medication, when that medication may have been assembled and checked a) on a totally different day when the RP wasn't present, or b) without the involvement of RP or a pharmacist at all save having had a clinical check carried out on it.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Personally I would positively choose pharmacies where the medicines are final checked by an ACT. In my experience they are much more focussed on the technical accuracy and complying with SOPs than a pharmacist, who gets distracted by other things. Right professional for right role.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • In the spirit of openness. In my hospital you have my clear undertaking that your prescription will most certainly have not been finally accuracy checked by a pharmacist but by trained, assessed and accredited technician and/or dispensers. This combined with electronic prescribing and automated dispensing produces significantly reduced dispensing errors as shown in our on-going process monitoring systems. Consequently I can re-direct that pharmacist time away from an area, dispensing, with error rates of around 1 in 5000 to medicines on admission with around 1 in 2.5 and prescribing 1 in 8. In my sessions with our patient forum they are highly supportive of this risk based approach.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

For commenting, please login or register as a user and agree to our Community Guidelines. You will be re-directed back to this page where you will have the ability to comment.

Recommended from Pharmaceutical Press

  • Print
  • Share
  • Comment
  • Save
  • Print Friendly Version of this pagePrint Get a PDF version of this webpagePDF

Newsletter Sign-up

Want to keep up with the latest news, comment and CPD articles in pharmacy and science? Subscribe to our free alerts.