Cookie policy: This site uses cookies (small files stored on your computer) to simplify and improve your experience of this website. Cookies are small text files stored on the device you are using to access this website. For more information please take a look at our terms and conditions. Some parts of the site may not work properly if you choose not to accept cookies.

Join

Subscribe or Register

Existing user? Login

PJ Online | PJ Letters: Primary care pharmacy

Home > PJ  > Letters | Search

Return to PJ Online Home Page

The Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 268 No 7182 p93-96
26 January 2002

This page
Reprint
Photocopy

Letters

Letters are available in a single PDF* file (70K)


  Community pharmacy
  Locums
  Education conference
  Primary care pharmacy
  Careers
  The Council
  Council election
  The Society
  Statutory Committee
  The Journal
  Christmas miscellany


Letters to the Editor

  * PDF files on PJ Online require Acrobat Reader 4 or later.

Primary care pharmacy

Pharmacists involved at grassroots level

From Mr P. Gimson, MRPharmS and Mr F. Kennedy, MRPharmS

We would like to comment on some of the points raised by Peter Jenkins in his recent letter (PJ, 5/12 January, p15). We agree with his point that it does not seem fair that one set of contractors can receive an incentive payment for hitting certain targets when other contractors cannot but we do not quite understand some of the other comments.

The letter states many general practitioners see primary care pharmacists as a free helper who works full time on getting their drug budget down. While we are sure many aspects of primary care pharmacists' work does involve cost saving exercises, a lot of it also involves implementing evidence-based prescribing policies. More often than not, this will result in an increase in costs and workload, not a reduction, as has been seen with the implementation of various national service frameworks.

Of course it is vitally important that local community pharmacists are informed and involved in this process, but surely this already happens in Wales. Mr Jenkins makes the point that all contractors should be involved at grassroots level. Each local health group in Wales has a community pharmacist on its board, and this pharmacist also sits on the prescribing sub-group. These groups discuss prescribing policy for that locality. As far as we are aware, all of these pharmacists are also members of the local pharmaceutical committee. We fail to see how you can get any more "grassroots" than that.

Paul Gimson
Faiza Kennedy

Cardiff

Back to Top

Previous Topic (Education conference)
Next Topic (Careers)
Send your letter to The Editor


Home | Journals | News | Notice-board | Search | Jobs  Classifieds | Site Map | Contact us

©The Pharmaceutical Journal

Citation: The Pharmaceutical Journal URI: 20005872

Rate this article 

Click to rate

  • 1 star out of 5
  • 2 stars out of 5
  • 3 stars out of 5
  • 4 stars out of 5
  • 5 stars out of 5

0 out of 5 stars

Have your say

For commenting, please login or register as a user and agree to our Community Guidelines. You will be re-directed back to this page where you will have the ability to comment.

Recommended from Pharmaceutical Press

Search an extensive range of the world’s most trusted resources

Powered by MedicinesComplete
  • Print
  • Share
  • Comment
  • Rate
  • Save
  • Print Friendly Version of this pagePrint Get a PDF version of this webpagePDF

Jobs you might like

Newsletter Sign-up

Want to keep up with the latest news, comment and CPD articles in pharmacy and science? Subscribe to our free alerts.