Cookie policy: This site uses cookies (small files stored on your computer) to simplify and improve your experience of this website. Cookies are small text files stored on the device you are using to access this website. For more information please take a look at our terms and conditions. Some parts of the site may not work properly if you choose not to accept cookies.

Join

Subscribe or Register

Existing user? Login

Education and training

Every pharmacist should have the time to develop their skills

In a profession that supports the health and wellbeing of the public, pharmacists must have regular protected learning time to enable them to carry out their crucial roles.

Every pharmacist should get time off to develop their skills

Source: Shutterstock.com

Half of pharmacists say they are never given protected learning time

Socrates is said to have uttered the words “The unexamined life is not worth living” at his trial, and the same could be applied to our working lives as well.

For members of any profession — particularly one that is providing a service that supports the health and wellbeing of the public — it is vital to have enough time to develop values, knowledge and skills through regular critical self-evaluation and learning.

A culture of ongoing learning is built into many healthcare professions — some GPs even go as far as closing their surgeries on an afternoon every week to train their teams and ensure that they are keeping up-to-date with the rapidly changing guidance and policies in the NHS.

But it appears that this culture has yet to take root in every part of pharmacy. The 2020 salary and job satisfaction survey by The Pharmaceutical Journal has revealed that half (51%) of pharmacists say they are never given protected learning time and 39% of all pharmacists said they were never offered structured training.

The problem is particularly acute in community pharmacy, where nearly three quarters (72%) of community pharmacists reported never having protected learning time, compared with 51% of hospital pharmacists. Among GP and primary care network pharmacists the figure was 19%.

And this culture starts early. For example, not all preregistration trainees are offered study leave allowances or protected study time as part of their contracted working hours and others have this taken from their annual leave allowance. Even those on the provisional foundation programme this year will not have protected time for learning, despite the recognition that they require additional support.

Those pharmacists lucky enough to be on the primary care education pathway in England do receive 28 days of leave for protected learning for a mixture of face-to-face events and supervision meetings, although the evidence shows that the most valued activity for many is often simply having the time to discuss information with peers.

Of course, revalidation requires evidence of continued professional development and peer discussion, but this should be more than an annual regulatory requirement; it should be a continual process of pharmacists getting out of their comfort zone, questioning what they are doing and learning new ways of doing things.

As part of its wellbeing campaign, the Royal Pharmaceutical Society is calling for “pharmacists to have access to protected learning time to support and enable their professional development”. Our survey data show that there is a way to go before this is the case for everyone.

Regular paid protected learning time should become standard for all pharmacists in all sectors, no matter what stage they are at. As the profession takes on more clinical and diverse roles in the health service, it will become even more crucial and patients will expect their pharmacist to be capable in any situation.

Citation: The Pharmaceutical Journal DOI: 10.1211/PJ.2020.20208354

Readers' comments (1)

  • I strongly agree with this. This should apply irrespective to the sector that one works for, community, hospital, academia etc. as keeping knowledge and skills up to date is equally important across all sectors.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

For commenting, please login or register as a user and agree to our Community Guidelines. You will be re-directed back to this page where you will have the ability to comment.

Recommended from Pharmaceutical Press

  • Print
  • Share
  • Comment
  • Save
  • Print Friendly Version of this pagePrint Get a PDF version of this webpagePDF

Jobs you might like

Newsletter Sign-up

Want to keep up with the latest news, comment and CPD articles in pharmacy and science? Subscribe to our free alerts.