Cookie policy: This site uses cookies (small files stored on your computer) to simplify and improve your experience of this website. Cookies are small text files stored on the device you are using to access this website. For more information please take a look at our terms and conditions. Some parts of the site may not work properly if you choose not to accept cookies.


Subscribe or Register

Existing user? Login

Urgent and emergency care

Antibiotics overused in emergency departments for suspected UTI

Research presented at a conference on clinical microbiology and infectious diseases suggests that many patients are given antibiotics for a urinary tract infection in emergency care when there is no evidence of an infection being present.

Dip stick for testing presence of a UTI


Data from a Birmingham emergency department presented at the European Congress of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases show that, while 91% of patients treated for lower UTIs received antibiotics, evidence of a UTI was lacking in 64% of cases

More than 60% of patients treated for urinary tract infection (UTI) lack evidence of the infection, a study carried out in a Birmingham emergency department has found[1].

The research, presented at the European Congress of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases in Amsterdam, The Netherlands (13–16 April 2019), used the electronic health records of 943 patients who attended the emergency department with a suspected UTI, of whom 191 were diagnosed with lower UTI. There were also 56 cases diagnosed with pyelonephritis and 42 with urosepsis.

Overall, 91% of patients with lower UTIs received antibiotics. However, clinical and microbiological evidence of UTI was lacking in 64% of cases. Likewise, most patients with pyelonephritis and urosepsis received antibiotics, but clinical evidence was lacking in 61% and 74% of cases, respectively.

For those diagnosed with a UTI in the emergency department, antibiotics were stopped for 16% at admission and 23% within 72 hours of admission.

The researchers said that although the findings were only from a single hospital, there was scope to further reduce antibiotic prescribing for UTIs within other emergency departments.

“Our findings highlight the importance and potential impact of reviewing and revising antibiotic prescribing decisions as part of antimicrobial stewardship initiatives,” they concluded.

Citation: Clinical Pharmacist DOI: 10.1211/CP.2019.20206543

Have your say

For commenting, please login or register as a user and agree to our Community Guidelines. You will be re-directed back to this page where you will have the ability to comment.

Recommended from Pharmaceutical Press

Search an extensive range of the world’s most trusted resources

Powered by MedicinesComplete
  • Print
  • Share
  • Comment
  • Save
  • Print Friendly Version of this pagePrint Get a PDF version of this webpagePDF

Newsletter Sign-up

Want to keep up with the latest news, comment and CPD articles in pharmacy and science? Subscribe to our free alerts.