Cookie policy: This site uses cookies (small files stored on your computer) to simplify and improve your experience of this website. Cookies are small text files stored on the device you are using to access this website. For more information please take a look at our terms and conditions. Some parts of the site may not work properly if you choose not to accept cookies.

Join

Subscribe or Register

Existing user? Login

Antiviral agents

Tamiflu and Relenza need a better evidence base for influenza, report finds

While a report questions the evidence base for neuraminidase inhibitors, it suggests that routine use during an influenza pandemic may be “advisable”.

The evidence base for influenza drugs such as oseltamivir (Tamiflu) and zanamivir (Relenza) must be strengthened, says report. In the image, micrograph of H1N1 influenza virus particles

Source: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)

The UK government has faced questions over the stockpiling of Tamiflu, a neuraminidase inhibitor, against the influenza virus (pictured: H1N1 virus)

The evidence base for influenza drugs such as oseltamivir (Tamiflu) and zanamivir (Relenza) must be strengthened, says a report from the Wellcome Trust and the Academy of Medical Sciences.

However, the report, initiated in response to a request from the Department of Health, says “the government will always have to make difficult policy decisions based on incomplete evidence and in the face of competing priorities”.

Neuraminidase inhibitors (NAIs) have been the subject of much controversy, especially after a 2014 Cochrane review concluded that Tamiflu did not reduce flu admissions to hospital, and it was questioned whether the UK government was justified in stockpiling these drugs. The review followed a long battle to gain access to the clinical trial data.

The report, ‘Use of neuraminidase inhibitors in influenza’, states that randomised control trials on the drugs are a “high priority”, despite the difficulties of conducting such research in the event of an influenza pandemic. However, it adds that pre-existing evidence from observational studies are not to be dismissed. It is “essential” that pre-agreed protocols are now put in place to collect high quality evidence for the drug’s effectiveness, the report says.

Richard Pebody, head of flu surveillance for Public Health England, acknowledges that the report highlights areas where the evidence base is more limited.

“We will carefully consider the findings of the report, but it is important to note that the UK remains one of the best prepared countries for future flu pandemics and antivirals remain a core part of our strategy,” he says.

The report suggests that in the event of a pandemic, or a particularly virulent strain of seasonal influenza, routine use of the drugs may be “advisable”. Pebody says “the UK maintains stockpile of NAIs to respond to a flu pandemic – with enough stock to treat 50% of the population”.

For patients hospitalised with severe influenza, the drugs can reduce the number of deaths, the report says. Therefore, it recommends that oseltamivir and zanamivir should only be used in cases where the patient requires hospitalisation.

But for the majority of patients, flu is a self-limiting disease and the report reiterates the findings from the Cochrane review that the use of NAIs has been found to reduce the duration of illness by only 14–17 hours. Pebody says that the findings are largely in line with current UK government policy.

In addition, the data indicate that for the medicines to be effective, they should be initiated within 48 hours of the onset of symptoms, in line with current UK recommendations. However, as use of the drugs is only recommended in severe disease, identifying these patients within 48 hours can be a difficult clinical judgement, the report says.

In the case of high-risk patients, the report says the evidence is clear that pregnant women hospitalised with flu should be given NAIs. But for other high-risk groups, such as children, there is a lack of evidence to guide decisions on NAI treatment.

John Ashton, president of the Faculty of Public Health, says: “The report shows there is good evidence for using antivirals in some cases, although they have no place in treating seasonal flu. People in at risk groups are more vulnerable, while there may be circumstances in which giving antivirals to large parts of the wider population is necessary.”

He says: “We agree with the authors that it is difficult to decide about whether stockpiling of antiviral drugs is necessary, because the evidence for this is patchy and the nature of future pandemics uncertain.”

The faculty supports the call for further research about what makes antivirals effective in treating influenza. “We also need to provide the public with clear messages about how we best provide the right coverage to whole populations when required,” Ashton adds.

Citation: The Pharmaceutical Journal DOI: 10.1211/PJ.2015.20069547

Have your say

For commenting, please login or register as a user and agree to our Community Guidelines. You will be re-directed back to this page where you will have the ability to comment.

Recommended from Pharmaceutical Press

RPS publications

Pharmaceutical Press is the publishing division of the Royal Pharmaceutical Society, and is a leading provider of authoritative pharmaceutical information used throughout the world.

Visit rpharms.com

Search an extensive range of the world’s most trusted resources

Powered by MedicinesComplete
  • Print
  • Share
  • Comment
  • Save
  • Print Friendly Version of this pagePrint Get a PDF version of this webpagePDF

Supplementary images

  • The evidence base for influenza drugs such as oseltamivir (Tamiflu) and zanamivir (Relenza) must be strengthened, says report. In the image, micrograph of H1N1 influenza virus particles

Newsletter Sign-up

Want to keep up with the latest news, comment and CPD articles in pharmacy and science? Subscribe to our free alerts.