Cookie policy: This site uses cookies (small files stored on your computer) to simplify and improve your experience of this website. Cookies are small text files stored on the device you are using to access this website. For more information please take a look at our terms and conditions. Some parts of the site may not work properly if you choose not to accept cookies.

Join

Subscribe or Register

Existing user? Login

sections

The Pharmaceutical Journal

Not just a voice for the profession

The Pharmaceutical Journal, through its editorial freedoms and fiercely defended independence, has always sought to continue to meet the needs of members now and in the future. In any business, moving with the times is fundamentally key to success and The Journal is no different if we want to ensure it remains a major membership benefit and a tangible asset.

The strategy outlined eloquently by PJ Publisher, Arash Hejazi, is to be applauded especially because we need to nurture the important crucial link between educational content and the Royal Pharmaceutical Society leadership and development team.

But there is more to the PJ than just being a journal, a website or a source for rapid, authoritative, insightful and arresting news. It is more than an interpretation of current policies, clinical and scientific research and trends affecting the profession in each country, and it is more than sharing or influencing policy or consultations.

I believe the PJ is not only the voice for the whole profession at all levels of healthcare and government, it serves to be a constant reminder of who we are, what we do and how we work to make a difference to members, other stakeholders and, ultimately, patients. It must reflect the culture, the ethos, the identity and the spirit of our professional body and our amazing profession to us and the outside world. It also needs to continue pushing boundaries, stimulate debate, think the unthinkable, be challenging, be cutting edge, share and exchange views, and promote activities. Most importantly, members must realise the PJ provides an influential steer for the profession.

The PJ has always been a good listener but, to continue listening, we need members to tell us what they think so the PJ continues to be fit for purpose, now and in the future.

 

Sid Dajani

Andover,

Hampshire

 

Mr Dajani is Treasurer of the Royal Pharmaceutical Society and an English Pharmacy Board member. The views expressed here are his own and do not necessarily reflect those of the RPS or board. — THE JOURNAL.

Citation: The Pharmaceutical Journal DOI: 10.1211/PJ.2014.20065547

Have your say

For commenting, please login or register as a user and agree to our Community Guidelines. You will be re-directed back to this page where you will have the ability to comment.

Recommended from Pharmaceutical Press

RPS publications

Pharmaceutical Press is the publishing division of the Royal Pharmaceutical Society, and is a leading provider of authoritative pharmaceutical information used throughout the world.

Visit rpharms.com
  • Print
  • Share
  • Comment
  • Save
  • Print Friendly Version of this pagePrint Get a PDF version of this webpagePDF

Newsletter Sign-up

Want to keep up with the latest news, comment and CPD articles in pharmacy and science? Subscribe to our free alerts.