Cookie policy: This site uses cookies (small files stored on your computer) to simplify and improve your experience of this website. Cookies are small text files stored on the device you are using to access this website. For more information please take a look at our terms and conditions. Some parts of the site may not work properly if you choose not to accept cookies.


Subscribe or Register

Existing user? Login

The EU has defined a "liberal profession"

From Mr J. Ferguson, FRPharmS

Ian Caldwell, in his article “What does it mean to be a member of a profession in 21st century Britain?” (PJ, 21 April, p461) mentions that we already see the impact of EU directives on various aspects of pharmacy practice. He also struggles with defining what a profession is.

It is perhaps of interest that those in the EU institutions have recently turned their collective minds to defining “liberal professions”, which are, according to the Directive on Recognition of Professional Qualifications (2005/36/EC) “those practised on the basis of relevant professional qualifications in a personal, responsible and professionally independent capacity by those providing intellectual and conceptual services in the interest of the client and the public”.

The directive has to be “transposed” into national legislation in the 27 member states before the end of this year. Perhaps this definition, adopted by the EU Commission, the Council of Ministers and the European Parliament, could be borne in mind in the discussions on the membership structure of the “new” Royal Pharmaceutical Society. The words “professionally independent” are, I believe, particularly relevant for the EU institutions.

Mr Caldwell also refers to the success of the UK Inter Professional Group in its “quiet lobbying” role. As one who has been attending meetings of the group (of which the Society was a founder member) for more than 20 years, I fully concur with that comment. And the same, in my view, is true of CEPLIS, the umbrella body for the liberal professions at EU level, of which at present I have the privilege to be president. The voice of the professions has never been stronger in Europe.

For the health professions that was clearly demonstrated recently in the overwhelming vote in the European Parliament to reject a proposal from its Internal Market Committee to reintroduce health care services into the Directive on Services in the Internal Market. This confirmed the recognition by the parliament that health care services, excluded as defined from the scope of that directive, are far too important to citizens of EU member states to be left to market forces.

It is worth noting the definition — “healthcare and pharmaceutical services provided by health professionals to patients to assess, maintain or restore their state of health where those activities are reserved to a regulated health profession in the member state in which the services are provided”.

Perhaps it would be prudent to consider this definition alongside the definition of liberal profession.

John Ferguson
Haywards Heath, West Sussex

Citation: The Pharmaceutical Journal URI: 10004159

Have your say

For commenting, please login or register as a user and agree to our Community Guidelines. You will be re-directed back to this page where you will have the ability to comment.

Recommended from Pharmaceutical Press

RPS publications

Pharmaceutical Press is the publishing division of the Royal Pharmaceutical Society, and is a leading provider of authoritative pharmaceutical information used throughout the world.


Search an extensive range of the world’s most trusted resources

Powered by MedicinesComplete
  • Print
  • Share
  • Comment
  • Save
  • Print Friendly Version of this pagePrint Get a PDF version of this webpagePDF

Similar topics

Newsletter Sign-up

Want to keep up with the latest news, comment and CPD articles in pharmacy and science? Subscribe to our free alerts.