Cookie policy: This site uses cookies (small files stored on your computer) to simplify and improve your experience of this website. Cookies are small text files stored on the device you are using to access this website. For more information please take a look at our terms and conditions. Some parts of the site may not work properly if you choose not to accept cookies.

Join

Subscribe or Register

Existing user? Login

Publishing

Tailoring our content to your interests

Finding out what members want and need is vital for any membership body, and user data from our website will help us deliver more of what you want.

Finding out what members want and need is vital for any membership body, and user data from our website will help us deliver more of what you want. In the image, illustration of feedback and communication

Source: istockphoto.com

A successful professional body relies on its members’ participation to help set its priorities, policies and strategic direction. However, among a large voluntary membership organisation, those who are actively involved usually only make up a tiny minority of the membership body. It is vital, therefore, to reach out to the wider membership to better understand its needs and wants. The Royal Pharmaceutical Society (RPS) is no different.

Queries logged with RPS support, for example, are analysed to see if there is a particular topic or issue that a significant number of members require more information or support — such as producing professional guidance or launching a policy campaign.

Here at The Pharmaceutical Journal, we monitor anonymous user data on our digital platform — pharmaceutical-journal.com — so we can better understand how our content is used and whether some things work, such as a certain type of headline or whether particular topics prove popular or not, as the case may be.

To gain greater insight into what matters most to members, we assessed the online articles on pharmaceutical-journal.com read by RPS members in 2015. Approximately 70% of these articles were about science, therapeutic interventions or medicines information, yet these articles makes up just 35% of our overall content. Strikingly, 27% of the content published in 2015 was dedicated to healthcare and pharmacy policy yet this only equated to 8% of content consumed by RPS members.

This information drives us to produce content more in line with the interests of members and continue to inform our editorial strategy for 2016 and beyond. We also feed this information back to the RPS governance bodies — the RPS Assembly and National Pharmacy Boards — so that they can allocate resources accordingly and help ensure the RPS as a whole better serves the needs of its entire membership body.

Citation: The Pharmaceutical Journal DOI: 10.1211/PJ.2015.20200306

Readers' comments (1)

  • Hello you say Strikingly, 27% of the content published in 2015 was dedicated to healthcare and pharmacy policy yet this only equated to 8% of content consumed by RPS members. How do you know that this is not the most read area in the paper copy?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

For commenting, please login or register as a user and agree to our Community Guidelines. You will be re-directed back to this page where you will have the ability to comment.

Recommended from Pharmaceutical Press

Search an extensive range of the world’s most trusted resources

Powered by MedicinesComplete
  • Print
  • Share
  • Comment
  • Save
  • Print Friendly Version of this pagePrint Get a PDF version of this webpagePDF

Supplementary images

  • Finding out what members want and need is vital for any membership body, and user data from our website will help us deliver more of what you want. In the image, illustration of feedback and communication

Newsletter Sign-up

Want to keep up with the latest news, comment and CPD articles in pharmacy and science? Subscribe to our free alerts.