Cookie policy: This site uses cookies (small files stored on your computer) to simplify and improve your experience of this website. Cookies are small text files stored on the device you are using to access this website. For more information please take a look at our terms and conditions. Some parts of the site may not work properly if you choose not to accept cookies.


Subscribe or Register

Existing user? Login

PJ Online | News: Further reductions in blood pressure do not slow progression of hypertensive nephrosclerosis

Home > PJ (current issue) > News / Daily News | Search

Return to PJ Online Home Page

The Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 269 No 7226 p771
30 November 2002

This article

News summary

Related websites
JAMA: abstract (more)

Further reductions in blood pressure do not slow progression of hypertensive nephrosclerosis

Additional reduction in blood pressure does not slow the progression of hypertensive nephrosclerosis, researchers report. However, they support recommendations that angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors should be considered as first-line therapy over beta-blockers and dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers in these patients.

Dr Jackson Wright, University Hospitals of Cleveland, and colleagues from the African American study of kidney disease and hypertension (AASK) study group compared the effects of three classes of antihypertensives and two levels of blood pressure control on the decline in kidney function in black patients with chronic kidney disease attributed to hypertensive nephrosclerosis.

They randomly assigned 1,094 patients aged 18 to 70 years, to receive treatment with metoprolol, ramipril (Tritace) or amlodipine (Istin), and to achieve a target mean arterial pressure of either 102?107mmHg (usual) or 92mmHg or less (lower).

The researchers found that mean glomerular filtration rate (GFR) decline from baseline through four years did not differ between the two blood pressure groups. In addition, the lower blood pressure goal did not reduce the rate of GFR decline, end-stage renal failure [dialysis or transplantation] or death when the outcomes were combined.

They say that none of the drug group comparisons showed consistent differences in GFR decline. However, ramipril was more effective than metoprolol and amlodipine in reducing the risk of the combined clinical outcome.

The study is published in JAMA (2002;288:2421).

Back to Top

Home | Journals | News | Notice-board | Search | Jobs  Classifieds | Site Map | Contact us

©The Pharmaceutical Journal

Citation: The Pharmaceutical Journal URI: 20008279

Rate this article 

Click to rate

  • 1 star out of 5
  • 2 stars out of 5
  • 3 stars out of 5
  • 4 stars out of 5
  • 5 stars out of 5

0 out of 5 stars

Have your say

For commenting, please login or register as a user and agree to our Community Guidelines. You will be re-directed back to this page where you will have the ability to comment.

Recommended from Pharmaceutical Press

Search an extensive range of the world’s most trusted resources

Powered by MedicinesComplete
  • Print
  • Share
  • Comment
  • Rate
  • Save
  • Print Friendly Version of this pagePrint Get a PDF version of this webpagePDF

Newsletter Sign-up

Want to keep up with the latest news, comment and CPD articles in pharmacy and science? Subscribe to our free alerts.