Cookie policy: This site uses cookies (small files stored on your computer) to simplify and improve your experience of this website. Cookies are small text files stored on the device you are using to access this website. For more information please take a look at our terms and conditions. Some parts of the site may not work properly if you choose not to accept cookies.

Join

Subscribe or Register

Existing user? Login

PJ Online | News: LPS assessments are appallingly inadequate - PSNC vice chairman

Home > PJ (current issue) > News / Daily News | Search

Return to PJ Online Home Page

The Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 269 No 7225 p731
23 November 2002

This article
Reprint
Photocopy


News summary

Related websites
Pharmaceutical Services Negotiating Committee (www.psnc.co.uk)


LPS assessments are appallingly inadequate — PSNC vice chairman

Assessments by primary care trusts of the impact of local pharmaceutical services proposals on existing pharmacy services are appalling, according to Pharmaceutical Services Negotiating Committee vice-chairman Steven Williams.

Speaking at a Dispensing Doctors' Association conference on November 16, Mr Williams said that LPS applicants could move into any area and destabilise the provision of existing NHS pharmaceutical services by bypassing the new contract controls built into the national pharmacy contract.

"The only safety net for existing contractors is that PCTs should consider an impact assessment which sets out how existing services would be affected should the LPS application be granted," he said. "I have to say that that the PSNC is, quite frankly, appalled at the way such assessments are being carried out."

Mr Williams said that assessments had been carried out with as little as a single telephone call with two questions and no opportunity for existing contractors to make any comments. PCT staff conducting the assessments were adopting a cavalier and arrogant attitude. The PSNC was sufficiently concerned about this to take it up with the Department of Health.

Back to Top

Home | Journals | News | Notice-board | Search | Jobs  Classifieds | Site Map | Contact us

©The Pharmaceutical Journal

Citation: The Pharmaceutical Journal URI: 20008232

Rate this article 

Click to rate

  • 1 star out of 5
  • 2 stars out of 5
  • 3 stars out of 5
  • 4 stars out of 5
  • 5 stars out of 5

0 out of 5 stars

Have your say

For commenting, please login or register as a user and agree to our Community Guidelines. You will be re-directed back to this page where you will have the ability to comment.

Recommended from Pharmaceutical Press

Search an extensive range of the world’s most trusted resources

Powered by MedicinesComplete
  • Print
  • Share
  • Comment
  • Rate
  • Save
  • Print Friendly Version of this pagePrint Get a PDF version of this webpagePDF

Newsletter Sign-up

Want to keep up with the latest news, comment and CPD articles in pharmacy and science? Subscribe to our free alerts.