Cookie policy: This site uses cookies (small files stored on your computer) to simplify and improve your experience of this website. Cookies are small text files stored on the device you are using to access this website. For more information please take a look at our terms and conditions. Some parts of the site may not work properly if you choose not to accept cookies.


Subscribe or Register

Existing user? Login

PJ Online | PJ Letters: Emergency hormonal contraception (EHC)

Home > PJ (current issue) > Letters | Search

Return to PJ Online Home Page

The Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 269 No 7213 p278-281
31 August 2002

This page


PDF* 70K


  Needle exchange
  Product names
  Type 2 diabetes
  The Profession
  The Society

Letters to the Editor

  * PDF files on PJ Online require Acrobat Reader 4 or later.

Emergency hormonal contraception (EHC)

Understandable misconception

Should advice be broader than just health issues?

Understandable misconception

From Mr M. K. Atkinson, MRPharmS

Having read Penny Beck's reply to the Manchester EHC scheme's founder project managers (PJ, 24 August, p247) I feel unusually moved to add comment. Was this the Tesco store that was reported in the south of England via national media as providing the "morning after pill" free of charge?

Assuming that my memory and understanding are not defective, was the reporting an unexpected consequence of a publicised Tesco health care promotion or a misunderstanding by press and radio of what patient group directions are?

I am surprised that Ms Beck considers that the disproportionate focus on one retailer and the widely held public misconception that Tesco was solely responsible for the pilot schemes is anything but completely understandable.

Martin Atkinson
New Milton, Hampshire

Should advice be broader than just health issues?

From Mr B. Shooter, MRPharmS

Last term while I was teaching one of the pharmacy practice groups at the School of Pharmacy, University of London, one of the students suggested that an imaginary 15-year-old friend of his family should be advised, on receiving EHC from him, that if she continued "in this manner" she would undoubtedly bring disgrace on herself, on her family and on her community and that "she should desist from it forthwith".

I suggested that some initial compliance advice would be more appropriate and that pharmacists were health care professionals and should not apply their own moral values when counselling patients. A robust debate then ensued.

I have now had time to reflect on what the student said. I wonder if pharmacists have stood back from offering advice on moral issues for long enough.

Should our advice to patients now be broader than just on health related issues?

 Barry Shooter
Romford, Essex

Send your letter to The Editor

Previous Topic (Product names)
Next Topic (Remuneration)

Back to Top

Home | Journals | News | Notice-board | Search | Jobs  Classifieds | Site Map | Contact us

©The Pharmaceutical Journal

Citation: The Pharmaceutical Journal URI: 20007540

Rate this article 

Click to rate

  • 1 star out of 5
  • 2 stars out of 5
  • 3 stars out of 5
  • 4 stars out of 5
  • 5 stars out of 5

0 out of 5 stars

Have your say

For commenting, please login or register as a user and agree to our Community Guidelines. You will be re-directed back to this page where you will have the ability to comment.

Recommended from Pharmaceutical Press

RPS publications

Pharmaceutical Press is the publishing division of the Royal Pharmaceutical Society, and is a leading provider of authoritative pharmaceutical information used throughout the world.


Search an extensive range of the world’s most trusted resources

Powered by MedicinesComplete
  • Print
  • Share
  • Comment
  • Rate
  • Save
  • Print Friendly Version of this pagePrint Get a PDF version of this webpagePDF

Jobs you might like

Newsletter Sign-up

Want to keep up with the latest news, comment and CPD articles in pharmacy and science? Subscribe to our free alerts.