Cookie policy: This site uses cookies (small files stored on your computer) to simplify and improve your experience of this website. Cookies are small text files stored on the device you are using to access this website. For more information please take a look at our terms and conditions. Some parts of the site may not work properly if you choose not to accept cookies.

Join

Subscribe or Register

Existing user? Login

PJ Online | PJ Letters: Food safety

Home > PJ (current issue) > Letters | Search

Return to PJ Online Home Page

The Pharmaceutical Journal
Vol 269 No 7226 p782
30 November 2002

This page
Reprint
Photocopy

   

PDF* 75K

Letters

  Smoking cessation
  Community pharmacy
  Mental health
  Remuneration
  Patient information
  Drug tariff
  Medicines in use
  Cannabis
  Food safety
  Alzheimer's disease
  The Society
  Onlooker


Letters to the Editor

  * PDF files on PJ Online require Acrobat Reader 4 or later.

Food safety

Medicines Act affects public confidence

From Mr J. H. Verrall, MRPharmS

For some time the public has not had confidence in food safety and this is due in no small part to the existence of Section 118 of the Medicines Act 1968. This "confidentiality clause" covers all information submitted in a product licence application and prevents open discussion on food safety issues. There appears to be little justification for such information to remain confidential (except perhaps for such things as details of a manufacturing process) and, since some data submitted by companies have not been peer-reviewed, there is every reason for it to be open to scrutiny and debate. That information relating to the safety of food is "proprietary and confidential", as suggested by some organisations, is unacceptable.

At Veterinary Medicines Directorate/stakeholder meetings, it has been established that the industry as well as the VMD are in favour of the repeal or amendment of Section 118 and, in the past, the House of Commons Select Committee on Agriculture has recommended "an early repeal of Section 118".

The Food Standards Agency, created by the Government because of the significant lack of confidence in food safety following "mad cow" disease, has also expressed support for the section's early repeal in the hope that "it will bring about greater transparency of the approval process".

The lead for such action is to be taken by the Medicines Control Agency and I understand this is to be implemented on the back of the Freedom of Information Act which, in a diluted form, received royal assent on 30 November 2000. However, the Lord Chancellor has said that the Act will not be implemented in all public authorities until January 2005 at the earliest. One wonders why there is such a delay and why it has to be implemented in all public bodies at one time.

What would appear to be an unnecessary delay in the repeal or amendment of Section 118 is to be regretted. Only when this is undertaken can public confidence in food safety be renewed.

John Verrall
Battle, East Sussex

Send your letter to The Editor

Previous Topic (Cannabis)
Next Topic (Alzheimer's disease)

Back to Top

Home | Journals | News | Notice-board | Search | Jobs  Classifieds | Site Map | Contact us

©The Pharmaceutical Journal

Citation: The Pharmaceutical Journal URI: 20008266

Rate this article 

Click to rate

  • 1 star out of 5
  • 2 stars out of 5
  • 3 stars out of 5
  • 4 stars out of 5
  • 5 stars out of 5

0 out of 5 stars

Have your say

For commenting, please login or register as a user and agree to our Community Guidelines. You will be re-directed back to this page where you will have the ability to comment.

Recommended from Pharmaceutical Press

  • Pharmaceutical Toxicology

    Pharmaceutical Toxicology

    Explains the methodology and requirements of pre-clinical safety assessments of new medicines. Includes registration requirements and pharmacovigilance.

    £40.00Buy now
  • Traditional Medicine

    Traditional Medicine

    Covers the major traditional medicine systems. Gives information on philosophy, practice, safety, evidence and examples.

    £43.00Buy now

Search an extensive range of the world’s most trusted resources

Powered by MedicinesComplete
  • Print
  • Share
  • Comment
  • Rate
  • Save
  • Print Friendly Version of this pagePrint Get a PDF version of this webpagePDF

Newsletter Sign-up

Want to keep up with the latest news, comment and CPD articles in pharmacy and science? Subscribe to our free alerts.