Hepatitis C and the potential for care delivery in community pharmacy
Community pharmacists are uniquely placed to deliver hepatitis C virus testing and treatment, and could help efforts in reaching the World Health Organization target for elimination of the disease by 2030.
Source: Panther Media GmbH / Alamy Stock Photo
There is growing evidence of the potential effectiveness of hepatitis C virus (HCV) testing in community pharmacies. Pharmacy screening could be effective at engaging individuals with a range of risk factors for HCV using dry-blood spot testing.
Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a blood-borne, positive-stranded RNA virus within the genus Hepacivirus and family Flaviviridae. Chronic infection causes liver cirrhosis and liver cancer and, alongside hepatitis B, it is a leading cause of mortality worldwide. The existence of HCV was first suspected in blood transfusion recipients in the United States who developed post-transfusion hepatitis despite testing negative for hepatitis A and B, and was finally isolated in 1989. Soon after its discovery, an assay was developed to detect the presence of HCV antibodies, which facilitated the screening of donated blood products by the early 1990s, further research into the epidemiology of the virus and the development of curative treatments.
What symptoms does it cause?
Most people with acute HCV (70–80%) do not develop symptoms, however, in a minority of cases, individuals may experience nausea, dark urine, anorexia, abdominal pain and jaundice. Only a minority of cases (15–40%) spontaneously clear the acute infection, with women, younger persons and those with favourable genetic polymorphisms being less likely to develop chronic disease.
Chronic HCV can be asymptomatic but may be characterised by a range of non-specific symptoms including sweats, rashes and mood disturbances which, while often considered mild and non-specific, are associated with a reduced quality of life. Due to the non-specific nature of the symptoms, many people with chronic infection do not present to health services and, of those that do, few undergo testing for HCV.
What are the consequences of chronic infection?
Over the course of 20 years since initial infection, around 20% of persons with chronic HCV develop severe scarring of the liver (cirrhosis), but this process can be accelerated in persons who consume excessive quantities of alcohol or who are co-infected with HIV. While cirrhosis itself may be asymptomatic, it can lead to decompensated liver disease, which is characterised by jaundice, bleeding and fluid within the abdomen (ascites), and primary cancer of the liver, known as hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
Having HCV can reduce life expectancy by 8–12 years. People with compensated cirrhosis (where there is liver scarring but the organ is essentially functioning normally) have a prognosis of around 12 years, but if they have decompensated disease median survival is reduced to just 2 years.
Who is at risk?
Chronic HCV is estimated to affect 2–3% of the world population, although the disease burden varies in different regions. The highest disease prevalence is in Egypt, where HCV was probably originally transmitted via a national vaccination programme in the 1950s and is now primarily sustained at endemic levels through contaminated medical and dental equipment. In other areas, including the UK, the prevalence is lower and since screening of donated blood products has been introduced, injecting drug use with non-sterile equipment is the primary vector for transmission.
However, other potential routes of transmission persist and include receipt of blood products (before 1991), receiving healthcare abroad with non-sterile equipment, sex with an infected partner, transmission from mother to baby (so-called vertical transmission), non-sterile tattoo equipment and haemodialysis.
The changing treatment landscape
The treatment of HCV has changed dramatically over the last few decades. In the late 1980s, interferon-α (IFN-α) was used to treat patients with ‘non-A non-B’ hepatitis (before HCV was discovered) and, although this was effective in some cases, many patients did not respond or later relapsed. Ribavirin was added to a longer acting IFN-α preparation (pegylated [PEG]-interferon) and the levels of sustained virological response (SVR) increased significantly. This became the mainstay of treatment, but many patients particularly with genotype 1 HCV still did not achieve a SVR to therapy, and treatment was associated with numerous side effects. Consequently, many patients (10–20%) withdraw from therapy and others (20–30%) needed dose modification during treatment. Furthermore, treatment had numerous contraindications, including decompensated liver disease (meaning those who were severely affected by HCV could not receive treatment) and pre-existing severe psychiatric illnesses.
From 2011, a new class of directly acting anti-viral drugs (DAAs), called protease inhibitors, were developed and given in combination with PEG-interferon and ribavirin (as so-called ‘triple therapy’) to patients with genotype 1 disease. This improved the proportion of patients achieving SVR but continued to be associated with side effects, contraindications to therapy and drug–drug interactions,. This has led to the development of other classes of DAAs including NS3/4A inhibitors, NS5A inhibitors and NS5B inhibitors. Given in combination, these drugs are more than 90% effective at achieving SVR, and, because they can be given without combination with PEG-interferon and ribavirin, have few side effects and few contraindications,.
Hepatitis C (HCV) elimination by 2030
The dramatic progress in drug development for HCV has resulted in the World Health Organization (WHO) setting a target for HCV elimination by 2030. However, the WHO also highlighted that a key part of achieving this goal was to reduce the number of undiagnosed HCV infections and increase the number of people engaged with treatment.
Most infections in the UK are in people who inject drugs (PWID); up to 50% of these individuals are not aware they are infected and many of those who are aware, have not been engaged with treatment services. This is important because modelling studies have highlighted that treating PWID can actually prevent further infections and lead to a faster reduction in the overall population prevalence of HCV. Therefore, it follows that to achieve the WHO target, identifying HCV in PWID and treating these cases is a priority.
Targeted screening and treatment for HCV — a role for community pharmacy
There are numerous barriers to testing and treatment in PWID that need to be overcome,,,. Attempts have been made to address these; in the UK a series of national action plans and National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidance have urged action to increase HCV testing, and this has prompted initiatives including GP record screening for people at risk of HCV, screening in emergency departments, screening in prisons and widespread testing in drug support centres,,,,.
There is also growing evidence of the potential effectiveness of HCV testing in community pharmacies. On the Isle of Wight, Hampshire, pharmacy screening was effective at engaging individuals with a range of risk factors for HCV using dry-blood spot testing and highlighted the importance of a robust referral pathway for engaging positive cases with treatment. It also demonstrated the importance of the unique relationships between community pharmacists and PWID attending for needle exchange or opiate substitution therapy in identifying and counselling PWID to undertake a test.
In Dundee, HCV testing has also been provided in community pharmacy but this has been extended to include pharmacy service provision of treatment. This has included a feasibility cluster randomised trial, which indicated that PWID were significantly more likely to engage with treatment if they were managed through their community pharmacy.
What would a pharmacy-based model of care look like in the future?
With the change in the treatment landscape for HCV, community pharmacists are uniquely placed, in having daily contact with PWID, to deliver HCV testing and treatment to this at-risk population. However, there are potential pitfalls in this approach that need to be considered when designing a future service (see Box 1).
Box 1: Benefits and barriers to community pharmacy-delivered care for hepatitis C virus (HCV)
Potential benefits of community pharmacy testing and treatment for HCV:
- Increased engagement in testing and treatment of people who inject drugs (PWID);
- Improved concordance with antiviral therapy, particularly among PWID;
- Reduced costs to local hospital services;
- Increased total capacity for treatment provision;
- Greater convenience for patients.
Potential barriers to community pharmacy testing and treatment for HCV:
- Limited drug availability;
- High community pharmacy staff turnover;
- Costs of community pharmacists’ time and testing equipment;
- Community pharmacy treatment room availability;
- Lack of HCV specialist nurse time/capacity to visit pharmacy;
- Lack of portable transient elastography equipment.
The study on the Isle of Wight was preceded by a national pilot of pharmacy screening in 2010, which identified more than 10 cases of HCV on the Isle of Wight, but only one patient attended a secondary care appointment and none received treatment. The reasons for this are unclear but at the time there was no locally available treatment and the referral pathway for positive cases was complex. Additionally, the later study noted that a small number of pharmacies provided the majority of testing. These pharmacies were characterised by highly motivated long-term staff and, importantly, also had a treatment room to conduct testing in a private environment.
To make a community pharmacy a ‘one-stop shop’ for HCV care, where a positive test leads to on-site investigations and treatment, further challenges are likely to be encountered. These include practicalities such as the availability of a bed to conduct transient elastography (currently the recommended assessment modality for liver fibrosis), the necessary training for community pharmacists, and the close integration between the clinical HCV operational delivery network and community services. A potentially more difficult hurdle to overcome will be establishing where funding for such community pharmacy services will come from in the fragmented commissioning environment. Figure 1 summarises how a ‘one-stop shop’ community pharmacy service could be structured.
Figure 1: A potential care model for hepatitis C virus (HCV) in community pharmacy
Illustrations by Juliet Percival
Reading this article counts towards your CPD
You can use the following forms to record your learning and action points from this article from Pharmaceutical Journal Publications.
Your CPD module results are stored against your account here at The Pharmaceutical Journal. You must be registered and logged into the site to do this. To review your module results, go to the ‘My Account’ tab and then ‘My CPD’.
Any training, learning or development activities that you undertake for CPD can also be recorded as evidence as part of your RPS Faculty practice-based portfolio when preparing for Faculty membership. To start your RPS Faculty journey today, access the portfolio and tools at www.rpharms.com/Faculty
If your learning was planned in advance, please click:
If your learning was spontaneous, please click:
Citation: The Pharmaceutical Journal DOI: 10.1211/PJ.2017.20203548
Recommended from Pharmaceutical Press