Cookie policy: This site uses cookies (small files stored on your computer) to simplify and improve your experience of this website. Cookies are small text files stored on the device you are using to access this website. For more information please take a look at our terms and conditions. Some parts of the site may not work properly if you choose not to accept cookies.

Join

Subscribe or Register

Existing user? Login

Report this comment to a moderator

Please fill in the form below if you think a comment is unsuitable. Please indicate which comment is of concern and why. Your comments will be sent to our moderator for review.

Report comment to moderator

MandatoryRequired fields.

Headline

New edition of BNF brings ‘fundamental change’

Comment

I feel I speak for myself & many of my hospital colleagues (both pharmacy colleagues & the wider multidisciplinary team) when I say the new look BNF is awful & the complete opposite of user-friendly. A large number of us prefer to have a paper copy nearby for easy access on the wards, in clinics & inevitably when all computers are being used by other members of the team at busy times. The fact that it is now broken down into clinical conditions & body systems being treated, rather than the old section & drug numbering system is ridiculously time-consuming. The old way worked beautifully, particularly as most of us pharmacists would have memorised each section in our sleep ready for our registration exam e.g. 5.1.1 penicillins instead of leafing through the vast "bacterial infection" section desperately trying to find the correct monograph in a hurry. Publishing the 2015-2016 editions with such a high proportion of errors was such an embarrassment for those of us on the receiving end. After distributing them throughout the Trust then 2 days later recalling them only to be told we would have to amend the hard copies in-house with non-existent support from the publishers was infuriating. I for one have lost a significant amount of confidence in the BNF brand & the information contained within it & constantly find myself referring back to the 2014-2015 BNFc to confirm dosing information. A huge let-down all round.

Posted date

13 FEB 2016

Posted time

10:39

Mandatory
Mandatory
Mandatory
Mandatory

Newsletter Sign-up

Want to keep up with the latest news, comment and CPD articles in pharmacy and science? Subscribe to our free alerts.