Cookie policy: This site uses cookies (small files stored on your computer) to simplify and improve your experience of this website. Cookies are small text files stored on the device you are using to access this website. For more information please take a look at our terms and conditions. Some parts of the site may not work properly if you choose not to accept cookies.


Subscribe or Register

Existing user? Login

Report this comment to a moderator

Please fill in the form below if you think a comment is unsuitable. Please indicate which comment is of concern and why. Your comments will be sent to our moderator for review.

Report comment to moderator

MandatoryRequired fields.


GPhC rates more than 600 pharmacies as 'poor'

Comment This FTP report, for example, highlighted that the pharmacist being sanctioned was experiencing, amongst other mitigating factors, "a lack of support from his employer" (bottom of page 15). We have seen this sort of statementin FTP hearings time and time again, often in relation to MUR targets (sorry, demands/expectations). What do GPhC, who also regulate pharmacy premises, do in relation to this? How often have GPhC performed such an investigation into an employer? If they do happen, are they available like they are for registrants' hearings? I, and many fellow registrants, look forward to a response...

Posted date

2 AUG 2018

Posted time



Newsletter Sign-up

Want to keep up with the latest news, comment and CPD articles in pharmacy and science? Subscribe to our free alerts.