Cookie policy: This site uses cookies (small files stored on your computer) to simplify and improve your experience of this website. Cookies are small text files stored on the device you are using to access this website. For more information please take a look at our terms and conditions. Some parts of the site may not work properly if you choose not to accept cookies.

Join

Subscribe or Register

Existing user? Login

Report this comment to a moderator

Please fill in the form below if you think a comment is unsuitable. Please indicate which comment is of concern and why. Your comments will be sent to our moderator for review.

Report comment to moderator

MandatoryRequired fields.

Headline

Advisory body on drug misuse to provide framework on medical cannabis by end of 2019

Comment

This article requires a comment. We have a great deal of knowledge and experience of the safety profile of cannabis which simply does not support the extreme claims made. Cannabis is widely used recreationally, millions of people do so, often from a young age. Many people continue the recreational use over many years, indeed decades is not uncommon. This has been happening for an extended period of decades. Recreational use involves high doses of the most potent varieties of cannabis, taken entirely without supervision or oversight. The supplies used are ungraded and vary greatly in terms of composition and purity. and are consumed in the most hazardous way possible by smoking, often mixed with tobacco. All of this amounts to "soak testing" cannabis in a way most likely to show problems and to cause harm. Despite all of this, the problems created by this extremely widespread and heavy use of cannabis are relatively minor. Medicinal use is nothing like recreational use. We are talking about use under the direction of a doctor, at much lower doses and of cannabis with a known profile and a high standard of purity. To claim: “the evidence for benefit is very small but the evidence for … more serious harms, is significantly higher”. “If you look at the number needed to treat, you need to treat between 20 to 25 people for 1 person to have good pain relief, but you only need to treat 6 patients for 1 to experience harm,” Is clearly ridiculous.

Posted date

13 MAY 2019

Posted time

8:38

Mandatory
Mandatory
Mandatory
Mandatory

Newsletter Sign-up

Want to keep up with the latest news, comment and CPD articles in pharmacy and science? Subscribe to our free alerts.