Cookie policy: This site uses cookies (small files stored on your computer) to simplify and improve your experience of this website. Cookies are small text files stored on the device you are using to access this website. For more information please take a look at our terms and conditions. Some parts of the site may not work properly if you choose not to accept cookies.

Join

Subscribe or Register

Existing user? Login

Report this comment to a moderator

Please fill in the form below if you think a comment is unsuitable. Please indicate which comment is of concern and why. Your comments will be sent to our moderator for review.

Report comment to moderator

MandatoryRequired fields.

Headline

RPS conference attendees back idea of prescriber post-nominals

Comment

"However, being a member means having a voice in the RPS. You have to be in to win it." Agreed. I'm sure it is a priority for the RPS to maintain and increase membership with a strong vision of professional leadership across all the pharmacy sectors. Should the RPS look into why prescribing pharmacists are not members? I think, and I'm happy to be corrected, that the post-nominal is set by the original authorising body; in this case the academic institution that the prescribing certificate was undertaken. If it not marked on that qualifying paperwork then it may be tricky for post-nominals to be bestowed.

Posted date

29 NOV 2019

Posted time

14:45

Mandatory
Mandatory
Mandatory
Mandatory

Newsletter Sign-up

Want to keep up with the latest news, comment and CPD articles in pharmacy and science? Subscribe to our free alerts.