Cookie policy: This site uses cookies (small files stored on your computer) to simplify and improve your experience of this website. Cookies are small text files stored on the device you are using to access this website. For more information please take a look at our terms and conditions. Some parts of the site may not work properly if you choose not to accept cookies.

Your RPS

Pharmacists must be core part of integrated health and social care, says RPS Scotland

The RPS in Scotland has expressed concern at the lack of a “clear policy” on the care of patients transferring between healthcare settings, and says that pharmacist expertise should be at the core of such a policy.

Responding to the Scottish Health and Sport Committee’s inquiry into ‘NHS Governance – Creating a culture of improvement’, the Society said that “between 30% and 70% of patients will have either an error or an unintentional change to their medicines when their care is transferred”. These prescribing errors could be reduced, the response goes on to say, by placing pharmacists in clinical roles within multidisciplinary teams: “It is imperative that there is pharmacist input at both strategic and operational levels within any new integrated health and social care structure”.

The response also says that pharmacist expertise must be made more widely available to healthcare staff across the sectors. “Traditionally, pharmacists have been the safety net for prescribing errors”, the Society says, “but they have an important role further upstream to ensure safe systems are in place” — particularly around managing patients taking multiple medications, as is the case for more than half of patients over the age of 70.

Elsewhere in the response, the Society also flags up the fact that pharmacists still do not have access to the emergency care summary, despite this being promised for community pharmacists in 2014. This, the response says, is “now an urgent patient safety concern and one which has been raised by the RPS, the Primary Care Collaborative and within the Caldicott Review”.

The full response can be read here.

Citation: The Pharmaceutical Journal DOI: 10.1211/PJ.2017.20203402

Have your say

For commenting, please login or register as a user and agree to our Community Guidelines. You will be re-directed back to this page where you will have the ability to comment.

Recommended from Pharmaceutical Press

PJJ Static MPU
  • Print
  • Share
  • Comment
  • Save
  • Print Friendly Version of this pagePrint Get a PDF version of this webpagePDF

Supplementary images

  • older patient being transferred from healthcare setting

Jobs you might like

Newsletter Sign-up

Want to keep up with the latest news, comment and CPD articles in pharmacy and science? Subscribe to our free alerts.